lLES
THE ANGLE IN A SEMICIRCLE 137
) right
angles
to two
riangle
■angled
tangles
rely, as
a proof
he case
fc'or the
whole
is any
3 a re-
ort of)
y, that
by one
lat the
[ual to
though
kinds
: every
now it
illy no
ng for
hetical
roposi-
ins.
ut the
e sum
iS *? It
gway.
3S first
figures
'parent
. parts,
latural
lich, it
would be found, could be drawn in practice), and to put in the
two diagonals. The equality of the opposite sides would
doubtless, in the first beginnings of geometry, be assumed as
obvious, or verified by measurement. If then it was assumed
that a rectangle is a figure with all its angles right angles and
each side equal to its opposite, it would be easy to deduce
certain consequences. Take first the two triangles ABC, BCD.
Since by hypothesis AB — BG and CB is common, the two
triangles have the sides AB, BG respectively equal to the sides
BG, GD, and the included angles, being right angles, are equal;
therefore the triangles ABC, BCB are equal in all respects
(ef. Eucl, I. 4), and accordingly the angles ACB (i.e. OGB) and
BBC (i.e. OBG) are equal, whence (by the converse of Eucl. I. 5,
known to Thales) OB = OG. Similarly by means of the
equality of AB, GB we prove the equality of OB,OG. Conse
quently OB, OG, OB (and OA) are all equal. It follows that
a circle with centre 0 and radius OA passes through B, G, B
also ; since AO, OG are in a straight line, AG is a diameter of
the circle, and the angle ABC, by hypothesis a right angle, is
an ‘ angle in a semicircle It would then appear that, given
any right angle as ABC standing on AC as base, it was only
necessary to bisect AG at 0, and 0 would then be the centre of
a semicircle on AC as diameter and passing through B. The
construction indicated would be the construction of a circle
about the right-angled triangle ABC, which seems to corre
spond well enough to Pamphile’s phrase about ‘ describing on
(i. e. in) a circle a triangle (which shall be) right angled ’.
(y) Thales as astronomer.
Thales was also the first Greek astronomer. Every one
knows the story of his falling into a well when star-gazing,
and being rallied by ‘a clever and pretty maidservant from
Thrace ’ for being so eager to know what goes on in the
heavens that he could not see what was straight in front
of him, nay, at his very feet. But he was not merely a star
gazer. There is good evidence that he predicted a solar eclipse
which took place on May 28, 585 B. C. We can conjecture
the basis of this prediction. The Babylonians, as the result
of observations continued through centuries, had discovered
the period of 223 lunations after which eclipses recur; and