I !.
252
THE DUPLICATION OF THE CUBE
Alexander: ‘ O king,’ said Menaechmus, ‘ for travelling over
the country there are royal roads and roads for common
citizens, but in geometry there is one road for all.’ 1 A similar
story is indeed told of Euclid and Ptolemy; but there would
he a temptation to transfer such a story at a later date to
the more famous mathematician. Menaechmus was evidently
a considerable mathematician; he is associated by Proclus with
Amyclas of Heraclea, a friend of Plato, and with Dinostratus
as having ‘ made the whole of geometry more perfect ’. 2
Beyond, however, the fact that the discovery of the conic
sections is attributed to him, we have very few notices relating
to his work. He is mentioned along with Aristotle and
Callippus as a supporter of the theory of concentric spheres
invented by Eudoxus, but as postulating a larger number of
spheres. 3 We gather from Proclus that he wrote on the
technology of mathematics; he discussed for instance the
difference between the broader meaning of the word element
(in which any proposition leading to another may be said
to be an element of it) and the stricter meaning of something
simple and fundamental standing to consequences drawn from
it in the relation of a principle, which is capable of being
universally applied and enters into the proof of all manner
of propositions. 4 Again, he did not agree in the distinction
between theorems and problems, but would have it that they
were all problems, though directed to two different objects 5 ;
he also discussed the important question of the convertibility
of theorems and the conditions necessary to it. 6
If x, y are two mean proportionals between straight
lines a, h,
that is, if a:x = x:y = y :h,
then clearly
x 2 — ay,
y 1 = hx, and xy = ah.
It is easy for us to recognize here the Cartesian equations
of two parabolas referred to a diameter and the tangent at its
extremity, and of a hyperbola referred to its asymptotes.
But Menaechmus appears to have had not only to recognize,
1 Stobaeus, Eclogue, ii. 31, 115 (vol. ii, p. 228. 30, Wachsmuth).
2 Proclus on Eucl. I, p. 67. 9.
3 Theon of Smyrna, pp, 201. 22-202. 2.
4 Proclus on Eucl. I, pp. 72, 23-73. 14. 5 Ih., p. 78. 8-13.
6 lb., p. 254. 4-5.