290
PLATO
regard to them either to themselves or any one else, but treat
them.as manifest to every one; basing themselves on these
hypotheses, they proceed at once to go through the rest of
the argument till they arrive, with general assent, at the
particular conclusion to which their inquiry was directed.
Further you know that they make use of visible figures and
argue about them, but in doing so they are not thinking of
these figures but of the things which they represent; thus
it is the absolute square and the absolute diameter which is
the object of their argument, not the diameter which they
draw; and similarly, in other cases, the things which they
actually model or draw, and which may also have their images
in shadows or in water, are themselves in turn used as
images, the object of the inquirer being to see their abso
lute counterparts which cannot be seen otherwise than by
thought.’ 1
(/3) The two intellectual methods.
Plato distinguishes two processes: both begin from hypo
theses. The one method cannot get above these hypotheses,
but, treating them as if they were first principles, builds upon
them and, with the aid of diagrams or images, arrives at
conclusions: this is the method of geometry and mathematics
in general. The other method treats the hypotheses as being
really hypotheses and nothing more, but uses them as stepping-
stones for mounting higher and higher until the principle
of all things is reached, a principle about which there is
nothing hypothetical; when this is reached, it is possible to
descend again, by steps each connected with the preceding
step, to the conclusion, a process which has no need of any
sensible images but deals in ideals only and ends in them 2 ;
this method, which rises above and puts an end to hypotheses,
and reaches the first principle in this way, is the dialectical
method. For want of this, geometry and the other sciences
which in some sort lay hold of truth are comparable to one
dreaming about truth, nor can they have a waking sight of
it so long as they treat their hypotheses as immovable
truths, and are unable to give any account or explanation
of them. 3
1 Republic, vi. 510 c-E. 2 lb. vi. 510 B 511 A-c.
3 lb. vii. 538 b e.