THE CONICS
133
i embraces
onics equal
tier matters
ucular, you
section can
, right cone
i to contain
uth I have
who wrote
>k on conic
jw proposi
es described
;es in many
ion of the
these occur
monstrated
i appendix,
ou as soon
idea of the
of the sub-
ality. The
itroduction,
:s of conics,
Dispositions
i; the term
i in exactly
great work,
devoted to
of the sub-
ntent of the
i first three
; bearing on
and in the
two conics
may intersect, touch, or both) the part which is claimed
as new is the extension to the intersections of the parabola,
ellipse, and circle with the double-branch hyperbola, and of
two double-branch hyperbolas with one another, of the in
vestigations which had theretofore only taken account of the
single-branch hyperbola. Even in Book Y, the most remark
able of all, Apollonius does not say that normals as ‘ the shortest
lines ’ had not been considered before, but only that they had
been superficially touched upon, doubtless in connexion with
propositions dealing with the tangent properties. He explains
that he found it convenient to treat of the tangent properties,
without any reference to normals, in the first Book in order
to connect them with the chord properties. It is clear, there
fore, that in treating normals as maxima and minima, and by
themselves, without any reference to tangents, as he does in
Book У, he was making an innovation ; and, in view’ of the
extent to which the theory of normals as maxima and minima
is developed by him (in 77 propositions), there is no wonder
that he should devote a whole Book to the subject. Apart
from the developments in Books III, IV, V, just mentioned,
and the numerous new propositions in Book VII with the
problems thereon which formed the lost Book VIII, Apollonius
only claims to have treated the whole subject more fully and
generally than his predecessors.
Great generality of treatment from the beginning.
So far from being a braggart and taking undue credit to
himself for the improvements which he made upon his prede
cessors, Apollonius is, if anything, too modest in his descrip
tion of his personal contributions to the theory of conic
sections. For the ‘ more fully and generally ’ of his first
preface scarcely conveys an idea of the extreme generality
with which the wdiole subject is worked out. This character
istic generality appears at the very outset. ,
Analysis of the Conics.
Book I.
Apollonius begins by describing a double oblique circular
cone in the most general way. Given a circle and any point
outside the plane of the circle and in general not lying on the