Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 1)

59] 
ON THE THEORY OF ELIMINATION. 
371 
To explain the formation of this final result, write 
V = 
«1, 
ft... 
«2, 
ft 
0.-1... 
ft', 
ft' 
«1 
au! 
ft' 
ft" 
of , a 2 ... 
ft'", ft'" 
which for shortness may be thus represented, 
V = 
12 
12' 
12" 
12"' 
where 12, 12', 12", 12'", f2contain respectively A, A, Z, /, n, n, ... vertical rows, and 
g, k, Ic, m, m, p,... horizontal rows. 
It is obvious, from the form in which these systems have been arranged, what is 
meant by speaking of a certain number of the vertical rows of 12' and the supplementary 
vertical rows of 12; or of a certain number of the horizontal rows of 12" and the 
supplementary horizontal rows of 12', &c. 
Suppose that there is only one set of equations, or g = h: we have here only a 
single system 12, which contains h vertical and h horizontal rows, and V is simply the 
determinant formed with the system of quantities 12. We may write in this case V = Q. 
Suppose that there are two sets of equations, or g — h — k: we have here two 
systems 12, 12', of which 12 contains h vertical and h — k horizontal rows, 12' contains h 
vertical and k horizontal rows. From any k of the h vertical rows of 12' form a 
determinant, and call this Q'; from the supplementary h — k vertical rows of 12 form 
a determinant, and call this Q: then Q' divides Q, and we have V = Q Q'. 
. 47—2
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.