Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 1)

7] LINES OE CURVATURE OF AN ELLIPSOID. 39 
From the equations (14), (29) it is easy to prove the well-known form 
X 2 y 2 z 2 _ 
a 2 + 0 + b- + 0 + We ~ 1 ( 30 ) 5 
in fact, multiplying (29) by m, and adding to (14), we have the equation (30), if the 
equations 
1 b 2 -c 2 \ 1 
a 2 + m B 2 -C 2 a 2 ~ aWe ’ ( 81 )> 
1 c 2 —a 2 1 1 
6 2 ^ 6' 2 - 4 2 6 2 b 2 + 0 ’ 
1 , a 2 — b 2 1 1 
— _i_ 
c 2 A 2 - c 2 (c 2 + 0) ’ 
are satisfied. 
But on reduction, these take the form 
{B 2 — C 2 ) 6 + (b 2 — c 2 ) m0 + ma? (b 2 — c 2 ) = 0, (32), 
(C 2 — A 2 ) 0 + (c 2 — a 2 ) 7ii6 + mb 2 (c 2 — a 2 ) = 0, 
{A 2 — B 1 ) 6 + (a 2 — b 2 ) md + me 2 (a 2 — b 2 ) = 0, 
and since, by adding, an identical equation is obtained, in and 0 may be determined 
to satisfy these equations. The values of 0, m are 
a _ (a 2 - b 2 ) (b 2 - c 2 ) (c 2 - a 2 ) 
a 2 (B 2 - C 2 ) + b 2 (G 2 - A 2 ) + c 2 (A 2 -B 2 ) 
b 2 c 2 (B 2 - (7 2 ) + c 2 a 2 (G 2 - A 2 ) + a 2 b 2 (A 2 - B 2 ) 
m (a 2 — b 2 ) (b 2 — c 2 ) (c 2 — a 2 ) 
(34).
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.