Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 1)

ON THE THEORY OF ALGEBRAIC CURVES. 
51 
10] 
o! — A\ ¡3' = B 6' = 11' are not all of them satisfied simultaneously). It will be 
seen presently that we shall gain in symmetry by wording the theorem thus: the 
degree of II is equal to the greatest of the two quantities m + n-t- 1, w-1. 
Suppose next, in addition to the equations (8), we have 
a! = A', ¡3' = B' f' = F, t’ equations, t! > t... (8'). 
Then, taking T', T', P', Q' the analogous quantities to T, % P, Q, and putting 
we have, as before, 
EV. U-ET. V = IT, 
IT = E [ET. PT'. (P' - Q') + PT'. P'AT' - ET. Q'AT'}. 
The degree of P'— Q' is t'- 2 (unless simultaneously a" = A", (3" = B" f" = F\ in 
which case the degree may be lower). The degrees, therefore, of the terms of IT are 
m + n — t' — 2, n — 1, m — 1. Or we may say that the degree of IT is equal to the 
greatest of the quantities m + n-t' - 2, m - 1 ; though to establish this proposition in 
the case where t' = n — 1 would require some additional considerations. 
Continuing in this manner until we come to the quantity II ( * -1 >, the degree of 
this quantity is the greatest of the two numbers m + n — t (k ~ 1} — k, m — 1. And we 
may suppose that none of the equations a (k) — A {k) are satisfied, so that the series 
n, IT IT*- 1 » is not to be continued beyond this point. 
Considering now the equation of the curve passing through the mn — t — t'... — t ik ~ 1} 
points of intersection of U = 0, V= 0, we may write 
W — uU + vV+pll +p'IT -fpifc-D n (t_1) = 0 (9), 
for the required equation; the dimensions of u, v, p, p'...being respectively 
p — m, p — n\ p — m — n + t+lovp — ra+1; 
p — m— n+ t’ + 2 or p —m + 1; p — m— n + ¿ (ifc_1) + k or p — m + 1, 
the lowest of the two numbers being taken for the dimensions of p, p' ...p (k ~ 1] . Also, 
if any of these numbers become negative, the corresponding term is to be rejected. 
In saying that the degrees of p, p' p( k ~v have these actual values, it is supposed 
that the degrees of II, 11' II* -1 actually ascend to the greatest of the values 
p — m — n + t + 1, or m — 1; m + n — t' — 2, or m — 1 ; — m + n — t (k ~ 1} + k, or m — 1. 
The cases of exception to this are when several of the consecutive numbers t, t' 
are equal. In this case the corresponding terms of the series II, IT IT* -1 ', are 
also equal. Suppose for instance t, t' were equal, II, IT would also be equal. A term 
of p of an order higher by unity than p — m — n + t + 1, or p — m+1, which is the 
highest term admissible, produces in pH a term identical with one of the terms of 
p'II; so that nothing is gained in generality by admitting such terms into p. The 
equation (9), with the preceding values for the dimensions of p, p' p (k ~ l) , may be 
7—2
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.