Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 2)

144] 
A THIRD MEMOIR UPON QUANTICS. 
335 
Also if the discriminant be written 
K(U)=. 
a k 
h b 
j i 
a n 
№ 33 
a ï 
9 1 
i f 
c i 
<& % 
ï § 
© $ 
j h 
l k 
9 1 
3 m 
% m 
© u 
then the values of 23, jp, î, 33t> If (equations (20) of 35) are 
= akg + 2hjl — 
23 = bih + 2fid — 
(& = cjf + 2gil — 
3-jp = bch + bij — 
3 © = caf + cjk — 
3p) = ab g + aki — 
aP — gin.? — fk, 
bP — hf 2 — kH, 
cP - fg 2 ~ Pj, 
ck 2 + 2gfk - 2 bgl +fP -f-j - fih, 
aP + 2 ligi — 2 chi + gP — g-k — gjf 
bj 2 + 2fhj — 2afl + hP — hH — hkg, 
3 1 = bej + cfli — bg 2 4- 2 kig — 2 ckl +jP — Ph — fij, 
3\$ = cak + agf— clP + 2 ijh — 2 ail + kP —j 2 f — gjk, 
33Bt = abi + biig — af 2 + 2jkf — 2bj l + iP — k-g — hid, 
6% = abc 4- 3fgh + 3 ijk + 21 3 — afi — bgj — chk — 21 gk — 2 Ihi — 2 Ifj. 
The equation K (U) = R = 64<S 3 — T 2 would however afford a perhaps easier formula for 
the calculation of the discriminant.]
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.