[104
as constantly with the
i with the positive or
or interchange of two
3 of two characters as
md consequently intro-
columns. Hence
may be calculated by
ich) as supernumerary
iber of permutations of
lumns will be employed
same mark placed over
he characters of that
e notations
104]
ON THE THEORY OF PERMUTANTS.
21
iy.
af columns, having the
will in the sequel be
)n-permutability will be
olumn in question, and
ant of an even number
question is placed; and
mark f to a com-
V*,... are such as to
•s a, ¡3, 7 ... A com-
to be altered in sign
se of the characters
shes when any two of
to be demi-skew when
for any permutation
of a commutant. The
T placing in contiguity
bar from the symbols
of the adjacent sets. If, however, the symbols of the same set cannot be placed con
tiguously, we may distinguish the symbols of a set by annexing to them some auxiliary
character by way of suffix or otherwise, these auxiliary symbols being omitted in the
final result. Thus
n 1 la
2 2 2 b
3 3 5a
v 4 3 66,
would show that 1, 2 of the first column and the 3, 4 of the same column, the 1, 2
and the upper 3 of the second column, and the lower 3 of the same column, the 1, 5
of the third column, and the 2, 6 of the same column, form so many distinct sets,—
the intermutant containing therefore
(2.2.6.1.2.2 = ) 96 terms.
A commutant of an even number of columns may be considered as an intermutant
such that the characters of some one (no matter which) of its columns form each of
them by itself a distinct set, and in like manner a commutant of an odd number of
columns may be considered as an intermutant such that the characters of some one
determinate column form each of them by itself a distinct set.
The distinction of symmetrical, skew and demi-skew applies obviously as well to
intermutants as to commutants. The theory of skew intermutants and skew commutants
has a connexion with that of Pfaffians.
Suppose V al3 y = F a+(3+v ... (which implies the symmetry of the intermutant or com
mutant) and write for shortness V 0 — a, V x = b, V 2 = c, &c. Then
0 0 0 0
.1 1 1 1J
.1 1.
= 2 (ac — b~),
= 2 (ae — 4 bd + 3c 2 ),
= (ac — 6 2 ), &c.
The functions on the second side are evidently hyperdeterminants such as are
discussed in my memoir on Linear Transformations, and there is no difficulty in
forming directly from the intermutant or commutant on the first side of the equation
the symbol of derivation (in the sense of the memoir on Linear Transformations) from
which the hyperdeterminant is obtained. Thus
12 4 . UU,
is 12 U'*U'\
'0
0'
is 12 2 . UU,
"0
0
0
0"
.1
1_
_1
1
1
1_
“0
t
0“
is 12 U^U’ 1 ,
i°
0
0
t
0"
_1
1-
Ll
1
1
1_