Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 2)

108] CONNECTED WITH THE THEORY OF ATTRACTIONS, 
it is easy to see that 
37 
(X 2 + v 2 )(P + u 2 ) = S 4 , (\ 2 - 6 2 ) (l 2 -f 2 ) = 8*, 
and 
;= eti 
b 2 a _ B 2 a, 
¥+P 2 “ 
_ v g2 /i _. 0 
p + v? v > li~fi ~ 
Proceeding to express the single integrals in terms of the new constants, we have in 
the first place k 2 — &k 2 , where 
k 2 = 
ai 
+...; 
or if we write 
we have 
/2 7 ! 
k 2 = 7 ^ L _+ 
P + u 2 ^-/i 2 
aa, + bb, ... = ll, cos m, 
211, cos ft) 
Hence also % = S 4 j, where 
{P + W 2 ) 2 (4 2 -/a 2 ) 2 (¿ 2 + *■) (¿> 2 -//) ' 
j=-,—^,^-k 2 - ^ 
(k 2 ~fff (¿ 2 + w 2 ) 2 ’ 
whence 
1 1 2111 cos to 
— 1 = , h ^ 7T- + 
*/ /o i ..o! 1 7 o _/*o * 
¿ 2 +W 2 ^8 ~/ x 2 (P + U 2 ) (l, 2 ~f 2 ) 
= (P + u 2 ) (l, 2 -f 2 ) № + U * 
where p 2 —P + l 2 — 211, cos co, that is 
p 2 = (a- a,) 2 + (b- b,) 2 + ...; 
consequently dps 2 + - v 2 = 8 4 n, where n is given by 
fl S 2 (p 2 + u 2 -f 2 ) g u? 
11 = 
(l, 2 -f 2 ) 2 (P + u 2 ) (l, 2 -f 2 ) (P + v?f 
and it is clear that e will be the positive root of 
0 
(P 2 + V? —fl) . 
■ C / 7 „ / 7 _ C 
are 
(h 2 ~fi 2 ) 2 (P + O (k 2 ~fi 2 ) (P + uj • 
It may be noticed that, in the particular case of u — 0, the roots of this equation 
(irp _ /2\ n 2_ f '2\ 
0, and • ■ Consequently if p 2 — f 2 and l 2 — f 2 are of opposite signs, 
Vi 
we have e = 0 ; but if p 2 — f[ 2 and l, 2 — fp are of the same sign, e 
(P 2 -.fi 2 )(h 2 -fi 2 ) 
PfP
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.