Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 3)

46 
ON schellbach’s solution of malfatti’s problem. 
[170 
and consequently 
where if 
v 2 +£ 2 = ^s 2 -2\l, v £=s(\-l), 
cj) = —-, (X — <j>) 2 = ^s 2 + (¡r — m 2 — n 2 , 
i.e. 
2 mn 
s 
4 m 2 n 2 
40 -1 m 2 — n- 
^ /{/ (s 2 — 4m 2 ) (s 2 — 4/i 2 ) 
Hence 
. , 4tlmn l /-—-— /——-— 
17“ + = y s 2 — vs 2 — 4m 2 vs 2 — 4?i 2 , 
??£■ = 2wmi — sl + Vs 2 — 4 m 2 Vs 2 — 4A 2 , 
g* + f = is 2 - - - Vs 2 - 4n 2 Vs 2 - 4/ 2 , 
s s 
££ = 2nl — sm + ^Vs 2 — 4?i 2 Vs 2 — 41 2 , 
p + = i.s 2 - - - Vs 2 - 4i 2 Vs 2 - 4m 2 , 
s s 
%t) = 2Im — sn + \ Vs 2 — 4/ 2 Vs 2 — 4m 2 , 
which is in fact at once deducible from the formulae in my paper “ On a System of 
Equations connected with Malfatti’s Problem and on another Algebraical System,” 
(Carnb. and Dvbl. Math. Journ. t. iv. (1849), p. 270 [79]). 
Write now for l, m, n, rj, their values in terms of a, b, c, x, y, z. We have 
(£« - y)~ + (1« - z? - 7 (i* - a) (1« - y) (¿S -z)= Is 2 - (f s - a) 2 , 
i.e. 
y 2 + z 2 Qs — a) yz — 2a {y + z) + a 2 = 0, 
or reducing 
and we have thus the system 
(y + z - a) 2 - 4 (l - ^ yz = 0, 
y + z + 2 \ - ^ Vyz = a, 
z + x + 2 u --^Vzx =b, 
x + y + 2 Vxy = c,
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.