Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 4)

292] 
A THEOREM IN CONICS. 
483 
and these equations are of course satisfied by p : q : r = A : B : C, since the line 
through (£, 77, £) is a tangent. They are also satisfied by 
l m n 
p : q 1 r ~Aa : Bf3 : Cy* 
as is obvious by substitution, we have therefore 
l m n n 
Ta XJr B/3 y + Cy Z = 0, 
or more simply 
A'P B' v C'£ A 
2 ! a n-- 7 
for the equation of the other tangent through (a, (3, 7), and we have in like manner 
B v A 
7 I + ?J + 7 i = 0 ' 
for the equation of the other tangent through (a, /3', y); the last-mentioned two lines 
intersect in the point X, Y, Z, that is we have 
Xf : Y V : Z£ = 
RG_BC C[A_CA' m A'B AF 
f3y (3'y ‘ 70! ya ’ a/3' a'/3 ’ 
or attending to an above-mentioned equation, we have 
X% : Yrj : = aa! : /3/3' : 77', 
which is the property in question. In the particular case, where the points (a, /3, 7), 
(a', ¡3', y) are the foci, the theorem is an immediate consequence of the well-known 
proposition that the product of the perpendiculars let fall from the two foci upon 
any tangent of the conic is a constant. 
2, Stone Buildings, W.C., 17th March, 1860. 
61—2
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.