Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 5)

174 
ON SKEW SURFACES, OTHERWISE SCROLLS. 
[339 
the lines G (in, n, p, q). The like remarks apply to the lines G (to 2 , n, p), G (m 2 , n-), 
G (to 3 , n), and G (to 4 ); but I will develope them somewhat more particularly as regards 
the lines G (to 4 ). 
16. Given a curve to, then (as in fact mentioned in the investigation for JV7) (to 3 )) 
through any point whatever of the curve there can be drawn 
(h — to -f- 2 = ) [to] 2 + m —2 + M 
lines meeting the curve in two other points, or say [to] 2 + to — 2 + M lines through three 
points. But in general no one of these lines meets the curve in a fourth point; that 
is, we cannot through every point of the curve to draw a line through four points; 
there are, however, on the curve in a certain number (= 4G {in*)) of points through 
which can be drawn a line through four points, or line G (to 4 ). 
17. But the curve to may be such that through every point of the curve there 
passes a line through four points. In fact, assume any skew surface or scroll whatever, 
and upon this surface a curve meeting each generating line in four points (e.g. the 
intersection of the scroll by a quartic surface). Taking the curve in question for the 
curve in, then it is clear that through every point of this curve there passes a line 
(the generating line of the assumed scroll) which is a line through four points, or 
line G (to 4 ). 
18. It is to be noticed, moreover, that if we take on the curve in any point 
whatever, then of the [to] 2 + m — 2 + M lines through three points which can be drawn 
through this point, three will unite together in the generating line of the assumed 
scroll (for if 0 be the point on the curve to, and 1, 2, 3 the other points in which 
the generating line of the assumed scroll meets the curve in, then such generating 
line unites the three lines 012, 013, 023, each of them a line through three points); 
and there will be besides \ [to] 2 + to — 5 + M mere lines through three points. The 
line through four points generates the assumed scroll taken (| [3] 2 =) 3 times, or 
considered as three coincident scrolls; the remaining lines generate a scroll S' (to 3 ), 
which is such that the curve in is on this scroll a (^ [to] 2 + to — 5 + J/)tuple line; the 
assumed scroll three times and the scroll S' (to 3 ) make up the entire scroll S(m 3 ) 
derived from the curve to, or say S (to 3 ) = 3 (assumed scroll) + S' (to 3 ). 
19. The case just considered is that of a curve in such that through every point 
of it there passes a line through four points counting as (£ [3] 2 =) 3 lines through 
three points, and that all the other lines through three points are mere lines through 
three points. But it is clear that we may in like manner have a line through p 
points counting as — l] 2 lines through three points; and more generally if p, q, ... 
are numbers all different and not < 3, and if 
i [to] 2 - to + 2 + M= a. \ [p - l] 2 + /3.1 [<? - l] 2 + ..., 
then we may have a curve to such that through every point of it there pass a. lines 
each through p points and counting as | [p — l] 2 lines, /3 lines each through q points 
and counting as $[q — l] 2 lines, &c....: the case p = 3 gives of course a lines each
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.