Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 5)

226 
ON THE SEXTACTIC POINTS OF A PLANE CURVE. 
[341 
and also 
V = (31, S3, <£, & @, fi, v\d x , dy, d z ), 
which new symbol V serves to express the functions II, □, occurring in the former 
memoir; viz. we have II = 2V<i>, □ = 2VfT, so that the symbols II, □ are not any 
longer required. 
8. I remark that the symbols 9, V are each of them a linear function of 
(9a;, d y , d z ), with coefficients which are functions of the variables (x, y, z), and this 
being so, that for any function II whatever, we have 
9(VII) = (9.V) II +9VII, 
viz. in 9(VII) we operate with V on II, thereby obtaining VII, and then with 9 on 
VII; in (9.V) II we operate with 9 upon V in so far as V is a function of 
(x, y, z), thus obtaining a new operating symbol 9.V, a linear function of (d x , d y , d z ), 
and then operate with 9.V upon II; and lastly, in 9VII, we simply multiply 
together 9 and V, thus obtaining a new operating symbol 9 V of the form (9*, d y , 9 Z ) 2 , 
and then operate therewith on II; it is clear that, as regards the last-mentioned 
mode of combination, the symbols 9 and V are convertible, or 9V = V9, that is, 
dVII= V9II. 
It is to be observed throughout the memoir that the point (.) is used (as above 
in 9.V) when an operation is performed upon a symbol of operation as operand; the 
mere apposition of two or more symbols of operation (as above in 9V) denotes that 
the symbols of operation are simply multiplied together; and when 9V is followed by 
a letter II denoting not a symbol of operation, but a mere function of the coordinates, 
that is in an expression such as 9 VII, the resulting operation 9 V is performed 
upon II as operand; if instead of the single letter II we have a compound symbol 
such as HTJ or so that the expression is dHTJ, 9HV^f, 9VHU or 9V_ff'V&, 
then it is to be understood that it is merely the immediately following function H 
which is operated upon by 9 or 9V ; in the few instances where any ambiguity 
might arise a special explanation is given. 
Article Nos. 9 to 11.—First transformation. 
9. We have, assuming always U = 0, the following formulae (see post, Article 
Nos. 31 to 33): 
(9j 5 + 1(V9 8 + 109^3 + 159A 2 ) U 
= !<27m> - 96m + 81) H№ + (17m 2 - 56m + 51) <J>3/f] 
+ (S^iy K- Um ~ 22)(0.'V) H - (10m - 18) d V H]
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.