Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 5)

460 
A SUPPLEMENTARY MEMOIR ON CAUSTICS. 
[359 
12. It is to be observed that for m < V2 the nodes are both imaginary; for 
m = V2 they coincide together at the point ; for m > VI they are both real: 
it is to be further noticed that 
node, x = \ (m + Vm 2 — 2), corresponds to cos 0 = ^ (m — Vm 2 — 2), 
where (m being > VI) the point (cos 0, sin 0) is a real point on the circle a? + y 2 = 1; 
in fact for m< § (that is, m = VI to m = f) we have |(m —W—2)<|m, that is, 
cos 0 < §; but m = or > f, then cos 0 = | (m — Vm 2 — 2) = —^ — is = or < |, and 
m + v m 2 — 2 
node, x = ^ (m — Vm 2 — 2), corresponds to cos 0 = ^ (m + Vm 2 — 2), 
where (m being > VI) the point (cos 0, sin 0) is a real point on the circle x- + y 2 = 1 so 
long as m is not > f, that is, from m = VI to m = f; but if m > f, then the point in 
question is an imaginary point on the circle—whence also the node x = ^ (m — Vvn- — 2) 
is an acnode or isolated point. 
In the case m = f we have 
node, # = 1, corresponding to cos 0 = | or 0 = 60°, 
„ a; = „ cos 0=1 or 0 = 0°, 
the last-mentioned point x — ^ being in fact the point of union of two cusps in the 
case m = f now in question. Hence in this case we have at (x = y = 0) a triple 
point equivalent to two cusps and a node; visibly, there is only a single branch 
cutting the axis of x at right angles. 
In the case m = V2, the nodes coincide as above mentioned at the point x = j- 
on the axis; for this value of m the coordinates of the cusps are 
x = VI(=||.-t- VI, which is < 1 -T- VI) ; y=± Vt- 
13. Starting from the equation 1024 (x — m) 2 U = S 3 — T 2 = 0, it is clear that the 
cusps are included among the intersections of the curves S ■— 0, T = 0; these two 
curves intersect in 24 points which lie 9 + 9 at the circular points at infinity, 2 + 2 at 
the points x — m,y 2 — l=0, and 1 + 1 are the cusps, or points x = m — fj m 3 , y 2 = (1 — f m 2 ) 3 . 
To verify this, writing for a moment 
S' = (x 2 + y 2 — to 2 — l) 2 + 6m (x — m), 
T = 2 (x 2 + y 2 — m 2 — l) 3 + 18m (x — m) {x 2 + y 2 — m 2 — 1) — 27 (x — m) 2 , 
then we have 
T' — 2 (x 2 + y 2 — m 2 — 1) S' = 6m (x — m) (x 2 + y 2 — m 2 — 1) — 27 (x — m) 2 , 
= 3 (x — m) {2m (x 2 + y 2 — m 2 — 1) — 9 (x — m)};
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.