466 A MEMOIR ON ABSTRACT GEOMETRY. [413
52. A onefold relation between the coordinates is expressible by means of an
equation of the form
(*$>> ^•••) ( ' ) = o.
53. The expression “ an equation ” used without explanation may be taken to mean
an equation of the form in question, viz. the equation obtained by putting a quantic
equal to zero; the quantic is said to be the nil factum of the equation. We may
consequently say simply that a onefold relation between the coordinates is always
expressible by an equation.
54. It is frequently convenient to denote the quantic or nilfactum by a single
letter, and to use a locution such as “the equation TJ =(*]£#, y..,) (-) =0,” which really
means that the single letter TJ stands for the quantic (*]£#, y,...) (,) , so that we are
afterwards at liberty to write TJ = 0 as an abbreviated expression for (*$#, y, ...)"• = 0.
We may also speak of the equation or function TJ = 0, meaning thereby the equation
U —0, or the function TJ.
55. A &-fold relation between the coordinates is (as has been shown) equivalent
to a system of k or more onefold relations; each of these is expressible by an equation
U=0, and the &-fold relation is thus expressible by a system of k or more such
equations. Representing by ((TJ)) the system of functions which are the nilfacta of
these equations respectively, the ¿-fold relations may be represented thus, ((U)) = 0 ; or
more completely, the relation being &-fold, and the number of equations being =$, by
the notation
((U) s) (k-fold) = 0.
We may also speak of the system or relation ((TJ)) = 0, meaning thereby the system of
functions ((U)) y or the relation ((TJ)) = 0.
Article Nos. 56 to 62. Resultant, Discriminant, &c.
56. In the case k >m, a given &-fold relation between the m+ 1 coordinates
(x, y,...) and the parameters (x\ y',...) leads to a (k — m)fold relation between the
parameters. This is termed the resultant relation of the given ¿-fold relation, or when
the additional specification is necessary, the resultant relation obtained by elimination
of the coordinates (x, y,...).
57. Consider a ¿-fold relation between the m + 1 coordinates (x, y, ...) and the
m’ +1 coordinates (x, y',...). If k ^ m, then, considering the (x, y,...) as coordinates
and the (x', y', ...) as parameters, we have corresponding to the given relation a &-fold
locus in the m-space; and so if kjf>m', then, considering the (x, y',...) as coordinates,
but the (x, y, ...) as parameters, we have corresponding to the given relation a &-fold
locus in the m'-space.