Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 6)

546 
ON POLYZOMAL CURVES. 
[414 
or what is the same thing, the equation is 
(L + M + N)[x(x — a) (x — b)(x — c) — y 2 {2x 2 — (a + b+ c) x + ab + ac + bc) + y 4 ] 
— (La + Mb + Nc) (x — a) (x — b)(x — c) 
+ if {(La + Mb + Nc) x + Lbc + Mca + Nab] = 0. 
In the particular case where L + M + N = 0, that is, where 
l m . n . 
t 1 1 r — 0, 
b — c c — a a — b 
the quartic curve becomes a cubic, viz., putting for shortness 
£ _ Lbc + Mca + Nab 
~ La + Mb + Nc ’ 
the equation of the cubic is 
„ _ (x - a) (x — b) (x — c) 
y- _ , 
viz., this is a cubic curve having three real asymptotes, and a diameter at right 
angles to one of the asymptotes, and at the inclinations + 45°, — 45° to the other 
two asymptotes respectively—say that it is a “ rectangular ” cubic. The relation 
= 1———|— 7 ^— 1 =0 implies that the curve V¿21 + Vm s $ + V?i(S = 0 is a Cartesian, and 
b — c c — a a — b 
we have thus the theorem that the envelope of a variable circle having for diameter 
the double ordinate of a rectangular cubic is a Cartesian. 
I remark that using a particular origin, and writing the equation of the rectangular 
2A 
cubic in the form f — a? — 2mx + a. + - , the equation of the variable circle is 
2A 
(x — d) 2 + f = d 2 — 2md + a + , 
that is 
2A 
x 2 + f — a — 2d (x — m) = 0, 
where d is the variable parameter. Forming the derived equation in regard to d, we 
have 
A 
and thence 
„ 9 4 A 
or + y 2 - a = -J- 
(x? + y 2 — a) 2 = = 16.4 (x — m), 
that is, the equation of the envelope is (x 2 + y 2 — a) 2 = 164 (x — m) = 0, which is a 
known form of the equation of a Cartesian.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.