Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 7)

[419 
420] 
9 
420. 
LTORS. 
ON BICCATFS EQUATION. 
which occur in the 
1866), pp. 461—472, 
[From the Philosophical Magazine, vol. xxxvi. (1868), pp. 848—351.] 
as follows: 
The following 1 is, it appears to me, the proper form in which to present the 
solution of Riccati’s equation. 
The equation may be written 
+ V 2 = x lq ~ 2 , 
ax d 
which is integrable by algebraic and exponential functions if (2i + 1)^ = ± 1, i being zero., 
or a positive integer. To effect the integration, writing y = - ~ , we have 
'll/ QjX 
ax 1 
The peculiar advantage of this well-known transformation has not (so far as I am aware) 
been explicitly stated ; it puts in evidence the form under which the sought-for function 
y contains the constant of integration. In fact if u = P, u = Q be two particular solutions 
of the equation in u, then the general solution is u = CP + DQ; and denoting by 
P', Q' the derived functions, the value of y is 
B x , 8 y , and P for B 
ly operator such as 
?hus E^E^*, if we 
*, i.e. (E 1 *)x(E 2 *), 
OF + DQ' 
y ~ CP +DQ ’ 
showing the form under which the constant of integration C -4- D is contained in y. 
To complete the solution, assume 
1.F« 
u = ze q ; 
C. Vil. 
2
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.