Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 7)

[485 
485] 
PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS. 
577 
3 form For instance, n = 4 ; partitions of (a, b, c, d) into two parts are (a, bed), (b, eda),, 
(c, dab), (d, abc), (ab, cd), (ac, db), (ad, be) ; no. is = 7. Partitions into three parts are 
(ab, c, d), (ac, b, d), (ad, b, c), (be, a, d), (b, d, ac), (cd, a, b) ; no. is = 6. Partition into 
4 parts is (a, b, c, d) ; no. is = 1. And we have 
1-1.7 + 2.6-6.1 = 13-13 = 0. 
iscriminant 
equation,) 
g equal to 
may take 
> 0 ; and we 
0, U' = 0 
e equation 
a) (S' - a') 
S'- a'= 0 
n UU' = 0 
at infinity 
= 0, q' = 0 
1 therefore 
the curve 
, the line 
point at 
Solution by the Proposer. 
Write n= aa + 6/3 + cy +..., where a, /3, 7... are positive integers all of them 
different, and a, /3, 7... are positive integers; and consider the partitions wherein we 
have a parts each of a things, b parts each of ¡3 things, &c. Writing as usual 
II (n) =1.2.3 ...n, the number of partitions of the form in question is 
Tin 
~Ua.llb...(Ua) a (U/3) b ... ’ 
whence, putting for shortness a + /3 + ... = p, the theorem may be written 
2(-r 
II (p — 1) Tin 
lia. 115 ... (IIa) № (II/3) 6 .. 
= 0, 
the summation extending to all the partitions n = aa + b/3 + ... , as explained above. 
Now if the n quantities x, y, z,... are the wth roots of unity, we have x + y + z ... =0, 
and therefore also (x + y + z...) n =0, and the general term of the left-hand is 
(na) a (n^) 6 ...^ №/36 '“^ 
where [a a /3 6 ...] denotes the symmetrical function 1 t x a y a ...(a factors) uPv&... (b factors)... 
of the roots x, y, z, u, y...of the equation 6 71 —1 = 0; where, as above, n= aa + b/3 + ... . 
Now by a formula not, I believe, generally known, but which is given on p. 175 of 
the translation of Hirsch’s Algebra (Hirsch’s Collection of Examples &c. on the Literal 
Calculus and Algebra, translated by the Rev. J. A. Ross, London, 1827), the value of 
the sum in question is = (— n > where p = a + b+ ..., (the sign +, given 
in the formula as quoted, is at once seen to be (—)^ _1 ); whence, substituting and 
omitting the factor n, we have 
2(-)* 
II (p — 1) Tin 
Tla. Tib ... (IIa) a (II/3) 6 
= 0, 
which is the required theorem. 
Observation. In Cauchy’s Exercices d’Analyse &c., t. 111., p. 173, is given a 
formula relating to the same mode of partition of the number n, viz. this is 
2 
Tin 
lia. 116 ... a a /3 b ... 
= Tin. 
,rts) = 0. 
C. VII. 
73
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.