Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 8)

150 ON THE MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION OF A CUBIC CURVE. [506 
Writing h = c, and for greater convenience h — c = d = 1; also to fix the ideas 
supposing b < a, and writing - = k, = sin X, then we have 
(X 
sin 0 = k sin </>, 
X = sin (j), 
1-cos (0 + <ft). 
J sin (f) 
that is 
xy — 1 —VI — ic 2 V1 — k 2 x 2 4- kx 2 , 
giving the rationalised equation 
x (y 2 — 2kx 2 ) — 2?/ + 4# = 0 ; 
the angle <£ may be anything whatever, but 6 varies between the limits ± X, the 
simultaneous values of these angles and of the coordinates being 
0 = 
0 
0 = 0 
x = 0 
y = o 
<f>= 
90° 
0 = x 
x = 1 
y = 1 + sin X 
</>= 
180° 
0 = 0 
x = 0 
y = ±° 0 
</> = 
270° 
0 — — X 
X = — 1 
y = — (1 + sin X) 
0= 
360° 
0 = 0 
x = 0 
y = 0; 
and it thus appears that the mechanism gives the continuous branch which belongs 
to the asymptote x = 0 of the cubic curve ; the other two branches belong to 
x = sin (f>, y = -f ,~h ^, which would require a slight alteration in the arrange 
ment of the mechanism. 
I remark that if AH, HI had been unequal, then writing Z HI A = this would 
be connected with 6 + </> by an equation of the form 
sin (6 + — m sin 
and the coordinates x, y would be rational functions of the sines and cosines of 
d, (f>, the deficiency is in this case >1.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.