Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 8)

527] 
ON A THEOREM IN COVARIANTS. 
407 
expressed as a sum of terms each of which is sharp or inferior: and we have to 
prove this for the next following degree m +1, or writing for convenience p in place 
of to + 1, (say for the degree p); that is, for a symbol 
[12... mp], = pi p2 2 ... pm [12 ... to] 
= P[12...to] suppose. 
I write as before <r l , <r 2 , ...,c m for the index-sums of [12... to]: those of [12 ...mp] are 
therefore <r x + X 1} cr 2 + X 2 ,.., cr m + X OT , and (for the duads involving p) <r p = X x + X 2 ... + X m . 
If [12. . to] is sharp, then [12.. mp] is sharp, and the theorem is true. 
If a p < ^n, then [12.. . mp] is inferior in regard to p; and the theorem is true. 
The only case requiring a proof is when [12 ... m] is not sharp (being therefore 
inferior) and when <r p is > \n. And in this case if any one of the indices X OT 
is S (or say if P is sharp) then the theorem is true. 
Consider the expression 
where a x , <x 2 , .., a m are as before the index-sums for [12..to] and therefore the numbers 
7l <t x —- X [, .., 'll o’jfi 
are none of them negative. 
Assume that when [12... to] is inferior, and when \ x ... \ m have any values such 
that their sum is not greater than a given value <7^ — 1, the expression is a sum of 
terms each of which is inferior or sharp: we wish to show that when \ x + X 2 ... + \ m 
has the next succeeding value, =<r p , the case is still the same. 
For this purpose, introducing the V’s I write 
then supposing for a moment that X x is not =n — <r 1 and X 2 not = 0, the expression 
contains the factor V x ._p2, which is equal to and may be replaced by — V 2 .pl + V p . 12: 
we have thus 
Q — Q + il, 
where omitting the V’s 
Q' = jP1 ..pm [12...to], 
0=^191' p2 pS ..pm 12 [12...to]. 
Now for Cl the sum of the indices X 1} X 2 — 1, X 3 ..X m is cr p — 1, so that by hypothesis 
il is inferior or sharp: that is, the difference Q — Q' is inferior or sharp: so that to 
prove that Q is inferior or sharp, we have only to prove this of Q', where Q' is 
derived from Q by increasing by unity the index of pi, at the expense of that of p2
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.