Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 8)

528] 
ON THE NON-EUCLIDIAN GEOMETRY. 
413 
We may, from the formulas 
a? = sin 2 q + sin 2 r — 2 sin q sin r cos a, a sin a = sin q sin r sin a, &c., 
but, more simply, geometrically as presently shown, deduce 
sin a cos B + sin c = - sin B sin q (sin q — sin r cos a), 
a 
sin a cos C + sin b = - sin C sin r (sin r — sin q cos a), 
and thence 
.. „ . w . „ . 1 . „ . ~ . . ism q sin r (1 + cos 2 a) 
(sin a cos B + sin c) (sin a cos G + sm b) = — sm B sin G sin q sm r < , . „ . , x 
7 a 2 cos a ( sin O' + sm 2 r) 
= 2 sin B sin G sin q sin r (sin q sin r sin 2 a — a- cos a) 
CL 
= sin B sin G (sin 2 a — sin q sin r cos a), 
which is the equation in question. For the subsidiary equations used in the demon 
stration, observe that the four points 0, X, A', B lie in a circle, and consequently that 
GO. GX = GA'. CB; or multiplying each side by sin G, then GO . GX. sin G = A'K. GB, 
that is, 
sin r (sin r — sin q cos a) sin G = a (sin a cos G + sin b), 
and the other of the equations in question is proved in the same manner. 
From the formula for cosh a we find 
sinh a = 
where - 
A, 
sin B sin G 
A 2 = — (1 — cos 2 A — cos 2 B — cos 2 (7—2 cos A cos B cos (7), 
whence also 
sinh a : sinh b : sinh c = sin A : sin B : sin G; 
and we can also obtain 
—t cosh a — cosh b cosh c . 
cos A = ; ; &c. 
sinh b sinh c 
So that the formulae are in fact similar to those of spherical trigonometry with only 
cosh a, sinh d &c. instead of cos a, sin a &c. The before-mentioned formula for cos a in 
terms of d, q, r is obviously a particular case of the last-mentioned formula for cos A. 
Cambridge, 11 May, 1872.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.