Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 8)

460 
NOTE ON THE INTEGRATION OF CERTAIN 
[532 
Here taking a = — 1, we are at liberty to make C and all the following coefficients 
= 0: in fact, if w’e commence by assuming 
the equations 
y = Ax a + Bx a+1 , 
(a + 1) (a — 2) J. = 0, 
(a — 1) (a 4- 2) B + qaA = 0, 
qipL + 1) B = 0, 
are all satisfied if only a = — 1, B = 
solution y = A (i - |) 
indeterminate quantity 
— qaA 
and we have thus the finite 
(«_ l) (a + 2)’ 
solution y — A — 2) ’ but ^ we con fi nue series, retaining D to represent the 
-q 3 a(a + l)(a + 2) 
(a — 1) a {a + 1) (a + 2) (a + 3) (a + 4) 
A, we have the solution 
y = A ^ + D (x 2 - \qa? + &c.), 
the second member of which is in fact the series derived from the root a — 2. 
This series is expressible by means of an exponential, viz. we have 
* - *«**+ &c -=f {S+^ - (3 - fe)} - 
and the complete integral is thus 
y = A(l- iq ) + B(l+ to)**. 
but this result is not immediately connected with the investigation. It may however 
be noticed that, writing z = ye qx , the equation in z is 
d 2 z dz 2 _ 
dx 2 ^ dx x 2 Z ’ 
which only differs from the original equation in that it has — q in place of q: 
there is consequently the particular solution z = - + \q, giving for y the particular 
CO 
solution y = (- + e~ qx , and we have thence the complete solution as above. 
Consider, secondly, the differential equation 
d?y 
dx 2 
(II), 
(derived from the equation (I) by writing therein ye~ qx in place of y); this equation 
is satisfied by the series 
y = Ax a + Bx a+2 + Ox a+i + &c.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.