Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 8)

533] 
463 
533. 
ON THE BINOMIAL THEOREM, FACTORIALS, AND DERIVATIONS. 
[From the Oxford, Cambridge, and Dublin Messenger of Mathematics, vol. v. (1869), 
pp. 102—114.] 
The following was part of my course of lectures in the year 1867. 
The proof commonly called “ Euler’s ” of the binomial theorem is as follows: the 
theorem is assumed to be true for positive integer indices; that is, it is assumed that 
for any positive integer m we have 
(1 + x) m = 1 + mx + — 
This being so, since (1 + x) m . (1 + x) n = (1 + x) m+n , the equation 
m (m — 1) „ 
|1 + mx H y~2 
x- + &c. H1 + nx + 
n (n — 1) 
1.2 
X 1 + &c. 
, m + n (m 4- n) (m + n — 1) , „ 
= 1 + —x + ^ L x 1 + &c. 
is true for any positive integer values whatever of the indices m, n; the equation is 
therefore true identically; and it is consequently true for all values whatever of the indices 
m, n. But any function <^m of m, satisfying the functional equation frm. <j>n (m + n), 
is an m th power, = C m suppose; that is, we have 
C m = 1 + mx + 
m (m — 1) 
1.2 
x 1 + &c., 
where C is a constant, viz. it is independent of m; but the value of C will of course 
depend upon x; and if, in order to determine it, we write m= 1, the equation gives 
C — 1 + x; that is, we have 
(1 + x) m = 1 + mx + m 9 ~— x 1 + &c., 
which is the binomial theorem in its general form.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.