Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 8)

533] 
FACTORIALS, AND DERIVATIONS. 
465 
to obtain [to + n] 2 we have to multiply this by to + r — I ; in regard to the first term 
to, I write the multiplier under the form (m — l) + n, and in regard to the second 
term n, under the form m + (n — 1) ; the process then stands 
[to + n] 1 = to + n 
TO + 'll — 1 = (to — 1) + n TO + (n — 1) 
m(m — 1) + mn 
+ mn + n(n — 1) 
\?n+iif = rn (to — 1 ) + 2mn + n (n — 1) 
= [m] 2 + 2 [to] 1 [n] 1 + [n] 2 . 
To form [m + ?i] 3 we have to multiply by m + n — 2 ; in regard to the first term, this 
is written under the form (in — 2) + n ; in regard to the second term under the form 
(to — 1) + (n — 1) ; and in regard to the third term under the form to + (n — 2) ; the 
product is thus obtained in the form 
[to] 3 + [to] 2 [w] 1 
+ 2 [to] 2 [n] 1 + 2 [/n] 1 [?i] 2 
+ [to] 1 [w] 2 + [n] 3 
= [to] 3 + 3 [/?i] 2 [w] 1 + 3 [??i] x [n] 2 + [w] 3 , 
and so on ; the law of the terms is obvious ; and the numerical coefficients are in 
effect obtained as follows : 
1, 1 
x by 1, 1 
1, 1 
1, 1 
1, 2, 1 
x by 1, 1 
1, 2, 1 
1, 
1, 3, 3, Î 
x by 1, 1 
&c., 
viz. by precisely the same process as is used in finding the numerical coefficients in 
the powers (to + îi) 1 , (m+n) 2 , (m + n) 3 , &c. ; and we thus see that for any integer value 
r of the index, we have a factorial binomial theorem, wherein the numerical coefficients 
are the same as in the binomial theorem for the same index. 
C. VIII. 
59
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.