Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 8)

560 
two smith’s prize dissertations. 
[553 
of the forces at corresponding positions is satisfied ipso facto; and the condition as to 
magnitude is 
r n in' s' t 2 
km x m*. m s t' 2 ’ 
that is, 
k' in' m x m« s'r' n t- 
k mfmf m sr n f- 
_m ' n+1 i® 
~m' t'*’ 
or, say 
t! 
t 
's'\ 2 / km y 
.*/ \k T m') ’ 
In the case n = 2, the present theorem (applying however only to the case of two 
elliptic orbits of the same eccentricity) agrees with Kepler’s third law, or say with 
the theorem 
lira 1 
WY 
that is, 
where observe that the /x, or mass in the sense of the formula, is the km, or 
attractive force on a unit of mass, of the theorem as above written down. 
2. In a family of surfaces F (x, y, z, p) = 0, containing a single variable parameter p, 
there is through any given point of space, a surface or surfaces of the family; or (if 
more than one, confining the attention to one of these surfaces) we may say that 
there is, through any given point of space, a surface of the family. 
Considering now two other families of surfaces, there will be through any given 
point of space, three surfaces, one of each family; and if (for every given point of 
space whatever) these intersect each other at right angles, we have a system of 
orthogonal surfaces. 
Supposing the equations of the three families to be 
F {x, y, z, p) = 0, 
(x, y, z, q) = 0, 
^ {x, y, z, r) = 0,
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.