Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 9)

607] 
A MEMOIR ON PREPOTENTIALS. 
325 
explanation. Taking cos a, .., cos y to be the inclinations of the normal at N, in the 
direction NP in which the distance « is measured, to the positive parts of the axes 
of (x, .., z), viz. these cosines denote the values of 
dS dS 
dx ’ '' ’ dz ’ 
each taken with the same sign + or —, and divided by the square root of the sum 
of the squares of the last-mentioned quantities, then the meaning is 
dW _dW 
ds dx 
dW 
cos a + ... + cos 7. 
7. The surface S may be the plane w = 0, viz. we have then the prepotential- 
where e (like «) is positive. In afterwards writing e = 0, we mean by 0 the limit of 
an indefinitely small positive quantity. 
The foregoing distribution-formulae then become 
(A), 
and 
which will be used in the sequel. 
It will be remembered that in the preceding investigation it has been assumed 
that q is positive, the limiting case q = 0 being excludedf. 
q = — Art. Nos. 8 to 13. 
8. I pass to the case q = — 2, we here have the potential-surface integral 
it will be seen that the results present themselves under a remarkably different form. 
The potential of the disk is, as before, 
2 (T^) s f P* 1 dr 
^ J (r 2 + ’ 
f This is, as regards q, the case throughout; a limiting value, if not expressly stated to be included, is 
always excluded.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.