Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 10)

178 
FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS ON THE DOUBLE ^-FUNCTIONS. 
[663 
Reverting to the before-mentioned comparison of the first and second columns of 
Table III., four of the equations are 
f 
X 
y> y' 
X, X 
y> y' 
{<=! = 
\d], 
that is, Vc [c] = 
Vrf [rf], 
{d} = 
that is, Vrf [rf] = 
Vc [c], 
{*} = 
- {a6|, 
that is, Ve [e] = 
- V«6 [ab], 
{/} = 
- {erf}, 
that is, V/[/] = 
— V erf [erf] ; 
viz. the four terms on the left-hand side are not absolutely equal, but only proportional, 
to those on the right-hand side. Substituting for Vc, Vrf, etc., their values, and in 
troducing on the right-hand side the factor 
the equations become 
V ac .be .ce. cf .ad. bel. de. df 
XX yy 
[c] = ac .be. ce . ef [rf], 
[rf] = ad .bd.de . df[c], 
[e] = — ce.de [ab], 
[/]=- cf.df[cd]. 
The functions on the left-hand satisfy the identity 
def[c] - efc [d] +fcd [e] - ede [/] = 0, 
nr, as this may also be written, 
def[c\ - cef\d\ + cdf[e] - ede [/] = 0. 
Hence substituting the right-hand values, the whole equation divides by ce.de.cf.df-, 
omitting this factor, it becomes 
ef. ac . be [d] — ef .ad. bd [c] — cd {[«,&] — [erf]} = 0, 
where the variables are y, y : it is to be shown that this is in fact an identity, and (as 
it is thus immaterial what the variables are) I change them into x, x'. 
We have 
ac . be [rf] — ad .bd [c] = (a — c) (b — c) (rf — x) (rf — x) 
— (a — d) (b — rf) (c — x) (c — x) 
— (c — rf) 1, x + x\ xx 
1, a + b, ab 
1, c -1- rf, cd 
= erf \xx abed], 
suppose.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.