Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 10)

[637 
638] 
25 
IY OF ELLIPTIC 
p. 29.] 
, writing Q—x and 
9), 
638. 
ON A (¿-FORMULA LEADING TO AN EXPRESSION FOR E,. 
[From the Messenger of Mathematics, vol. vi. (1877), pp. 63—66.] 
It is to be shown that we have identically 
(1 + + 2+ 2j* + ...)< - 16 (j^+ n^ + riy + -) 
1 - 9q - 25q 3 + 49g 6 + 81 g lu - ... 
1 - q — q s + q 6 + q w — ... 
or, what is the same thing, 
(1 _ 2s + 2s* - 2j* + .. .)* - 16 + ...) 
_ 1 + 9</ + %5q 3 + 49q 6 4- SI«? 10 + ... 
i + q + q 3 + q 6 + q 10 + ■■■ 
(A); 
(B), 
where the form (A) is that intended to be made use of, but the form (B) is rather 
more convenient for the demonstration. 
We have 
(1-2S + 2S 4 —2s* + ...)<=l + 8{ i ^ + I ^-^l + ...} 
(Jacobi, Fund. Nova, p. 188, Ges. Werke, t. i., p. 239), taking the formula as there 
written down, and changing q into — q. 
Also, if for a moment 
and 
X = 1 + q + q 3 + f + q w + & c., 
r, dX 
X' 
dq 
C. X. 
4
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.