Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 10)

[645 
645] 
a smith’s prize paper, 1877. 
45 
imum, parameter 
rrounded by the 
n parameter, we 
val belonging to 
e other, the two 
re have a closed 
tie case supposed 
single point of 
imum parameter, 
it point. If we 
that this point 
light, each loop 
, and the figure 
rves. 
ifficulty that the 
nee appears from 
the difficulty is 
rential equations 
ng an attraction, 
lirectly with the 
ar plane through 
the problem is 
force varying as 
y similar to the 
circle into rings, 
attraction as if 
ir the radius of 
traction is = rrr 
3 surfaces to be 
of the equation 
= 0, where L is 
on of the order 
tired number of 
of L and of M, 
we obtain here 
e of r, we have 
function of the 
the first three cases the equation of the required conic in point-coordinates; and then, 
by changing these into line-coordinates, we have the equations for the remaining three 
cases. 
p = o: 5 points. The equation of the conic is 
(a, b, c, f, g, K$x, y, z) 2 = 0, 
and we have 5 linear equations to determine the ratios of the coefficients ; the number 
is therefore = 1. 
p = 4: 4 points and 1 line. Taking U= 0 and F=0, the equations of any two 
conics each passing through the four points, the equation of the required conic will 
be U + \V= 0, and the condition of touching a given line gives a quadric equation 
for A; the number is therefore =2. 
p = 3: 3 points and 2 lines. In the same manner, by taking U = 0, F= 0, W — 0, 
for the equations of any three conics through the three points; or if the equations 
of the lines containing the three points in pairs are x = 0, y = 0, z = 0, then the 
equations of the three conics are yz — 0, zx- 0, xy = 0, and the equation of any conic 
through these points is fyz + gzx + hxy = 0; the conditions of touching two given lines 
%x + yy + £z = 0 and %'x + yy + t,'z = 0, are 
V/ VI+ \/v + V^W£ = o> V/VI’ + V<7 vV + \/h vr = ^ 5 
we have thus the ratios \Jf : \/g : \Jh linearly determined in terms of VI) \/v> 
there is no loss of generality in taking VI) V!’ each with a determinate sign, the 
signs of V 1 ?) &c. being then arbitrary, we have 2 4 , =16 values of *Jf : \/g : y/h, and 
therefore one-fourth of this = 4, for the number of values of f : g : h; that is, the 
number is =4. 
11. This is a known theory; taking x u y u z x for the linear functions of x, y, z, 
which are such that 
(a, b, c, /, g, h\x lt y x , z Y f = (a, b, c, f g, K$x, y, z)\ 
then assuming x 1} y lt z x = 2% — x, 2y—y, 2£—z respectively, we have 
(a,...$2%-x, 2y-y, 2£-zj = {a,...\x, y, z)\ 
or, omitting terms which destroy each other, and throwing out the factor 4, this is 
(a, ...5|, y, £)*= (a, V, 15«) y, 
an equation which is satisfied identically by assuming 
cii; + hy +g£=ax + hy+gz . - vy + fit;, 
kg + by +/| = hx + by +fz + vi; . — A£, 
g^+fy +c£=gx+fy + cz-gt; + \y . , 
re obtained most 
;) by finding for
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.