Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 11)

62 A PROBLEM IN PARTITIONS. [722 
The question is important from its connexion with the theory of groups, but it 
seems to be a very difficult one. 
I take the opportunity of mentioning the following theorem : two non-commutative 
symbols a, /3, which are such that /3a — a 2 /3 2 cannot give rise to a group made up of 
symbols of the form a p /3 q . In fact, the assumed relation gives /3a 2 = a 2 /3a 2 /3 2 ; and 
hence, if /3a 2 be of the form in question, = a x [3 y suppose, we have 
a x /3y = a 2 . a x /3 y . /3 2 , = a x+ -(3 y+2 ; 
that is, l=a 2 /3 2 , and thence /3a = 1, that is, /3 = a~ 1 , viz. the symbols are commutative, 
and the only group is that made up of the powers of a.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.