Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 12)

70 
ON DOUBLE ALGEBRA. 
[814 
15. First, if the form be A, B, or C; there will be the two idem-or-nil symbols 
x and y, that is, we may assume 6 = 0, g = 0; and the associative conditions then 
become cd — 0, c(c — h) = 0, d(d — a) = 0, viz. for the forms A, B, C, 
A. x 2 = x, y 2 = y, 
B. x 2 — x, y 2 = 0, 
C. x 2 = 0, y 2 = 0, 
these are cd = 0, c(c —1) = 0, d(d— 1) = 0; c = 0 or 1, d = 0 or 1, 
„ cd = 0, c 2 = 0, d(d— 1) = 0; c = 0, d = 0 or 1, 
„ cd = 0, c 2 = 0, d 2 = 0 ; c = 0, d = 0. 
But for the form A, if c = 0, d = l, that is, xy = yx = y, then, writing z=x — y, we have 
z 2 — z, yz = zy = 0, y 2 = y. And similarly, if c = 1, d — 0, that is, xy = yx = x, then, writing 
z — — x + y, we have z 2 = z, zx — xz = 0, x 2 = x. That is, each of these is reduced to the 
first case c = 0, d= 0; that is, x 2 = x, xy = yx = 0, y 2 = y. 
For the form B, if c = 0, d = l, then the system is x 2 = x, xy = yx = y, y 2 = 0; and 
this cannot be reduced to the first case x 2 — x, xy — yx = 0, y 2 = 0. 
For the form C, there is only one case, as above. 
For the form E, we have a = 0, 6 = 0, (c = e, d = 0, in order that the system may 
be commutative), h — 2c, viz. the equations must be x 2 = 0, xy = yx = cx, y 2 = gx+2cy. 
The associative conditions then give c = 0; or, the system is x 2 =0, xy = yx — 0, y 2 = gx. 
Writing - instead of x, and for convenience interchanging x and y, the equations are 
x 2 = y, xy = yx = 0, y 2 = 0. 
16. The commutative associative system is thus seen to be reducible as follows :— 
A. system is x 2 — x, xy = yx = 0, y 2 = y, first mixed system, see No. 2. 
B. 
or else 
B. 
c. 
E. 
„ x 2 = x, xy = yx = y, y 2 = 0, Peirce’s system (a 2 ), 
„ x 2 = x, xy = yx = 0, y 2 = 0, second mixed system. 
„ x 2 = 0, xy = yx = 0, y 2 = 0, third mixed system. 
„ x 2 = y, xy = yx = 0, y 2 = 0, Peirce’s system (c 2 ). 
I said, at the end of my Note before referred to, that it had been pointed out 
to me “that my system [the commutative associative system], in the general case 
ad — be not = 0, is expressible as a mixture of two algebras of the form (cq), see 
American Journal of Mathematics, vol. iv., p. 120; whereas, if ad — be = 0, it is reducible 
to the form (c 2 ), see p. 122 (Z.c.).” The accurate conclusion is as above, that the 
commutative associative system is either a mixed system of one of the three forms, 
or else a system (a 2 ), or (c 2 ). 
17. Considering next the non-commutative associative systems, we have here, ante, 
No. 14, 6 = 0, g = 0 ; and the relations which remain to be satisfied then are 
cd = 0, ef— 0, c (c — h) = 0, d (d — a) = 0, e (e — h) = 0, / (/— a) = 0, 
a(c — e) — cf+ de = 0, h (/— d) — cf+ de = 0.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.