Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 13)

r 
Ui ! 
.348 
[938 
938. 
ON TWO CUBIC EQUATIONS. 
[From the Messenger of Mathematics, vol. xxn. (1893), pp. 69—71.] 
Starting from the equations 
2 + a = b 2 , 
2 + b = c 2 , 
2 + c = a?, 
then eliminating h, c, we find 
that is, 
(a 4 — 4a 2 + 2) 2 — (a + 2) = 0, 
a 8 — 8a 6 + 20a. 4 — 16a 2 — a + 2 = 0 ; 
we satisfy the equations by a = b = c, and thence by 
a 2 — a — 2 = (a — 2) (a + 1) = 0 : 
there remains a sextic equation breaking up into two cubic equations; the octic 
equation may in fact be written 
(a — 2) (a 4- 1) (a 3 + a 2 — 2a — 1) (a 3 — 3a + 1) = 0, 
and we have thus the two cubic equations 
x 3 + x 1 — 2# — 1 = 0, of — 2>x + 1 = 0, 
for each of which the roots (a, b, c) taken in a proper order are such that 2 + a = b 2 , 
2 + b = c 2 , 2 + c = a 2 . 
It may be remarked that starting from y 3 + y 2 — 2y — l = Q, y 2 = x+ 2, the first 
equation gives (y 3 — 2y) 2 — (y 2 — l) 2 = 0, that is, y 6 — 5y* + 6i/ 2 — 1 = 0, whence 
that is, 
(x + 2) 3 — 5 {x + 2) 2 + 6 {x + 2) — 1 = 0, 
¿c 3 + x 2 — 2x — 1 =0.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.