Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 13)

358 
[941 
941. 
NOTE ON THE PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION 
Rr + Ss + Tt + U (s 2 — rt) — V— 0. 
[From the Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. xxvi. (1893), 
pp. 1—5.] 
It is well known that this equation, R, S, T, U, V being any functions whatever 
of (x, y, z, p, q), in the case where u admits of an integral of the form u=f(v) 
(u, v functions of x, y, z, p, q, and f an arbitrary functional symbol) can be integrated 
as follows; viz. taking m 1} ra 2 as the roots of the quadratic equation 
m 2 — Sm + RT — UV = 0, 
(that is, writing m 1 + m 2 = S and m 1 m„ = RT—UV), then, m 1 denoting either root at 
pleasure, and m 2 the other root of the quadratic equation, if the system of ordinary 
differential equations 
m x dx — Rdy + U dq = 0, 
— T dx + m 2 dy + U dp = 0, 
— V dx + m 2 dq + R dp = 0, 
— Vdy + T dq + m Y dp = 0, 
— p dx — q dy + dz = 0, 
(equivalent to three independent equations) admits of two integrals u = const, and 
v = const., the solution of the given partial differential equation is u = f{v). 
In fact, to prove this, we have 
du= \( m x dx — Rdy + U dq) 
+ p (— T dx + m 2 dy + U dp) 
+ v {— V dx + m 2 dq + R dp) 
+ p (— V dy + T dq + m x dp) 
+ o- (— pdx — q dy + dz),
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.