Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 13)

20 
[892 
893] 
892. 
NOTE ON THE ORTHOMORPHIC TRANSFORMATION OF A 
CIRCLE INTO ITSELF. 
[From the Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, vol. vm. (1890), 
pp. 91, 92.] 
The following is, of course, substantially well known, but it strikes me as rather 
pretty:—to find the orthomorphic transformation of the circle 
+ y 2 — 1 = 0 
into itself. Assume this to be 
A (x + iy) + B 
0B 1 + lVi= -t -n, • 
1 J1 1 + G(x + iy) 
Then, writing A', B', C' for the conjugates of A, B, G, we have 
A' (x — iy) + B' 
x '~ ly '= l + G'(x-iy) ; 
and then 
A A' (,x 2 + y 2 ) + AB' (x + iy) + A'B (x — iy) + BB' 
Xl +yi ~ T+C(x + iy) + G' (x - iy) + CC {a? + f) 
which should be an identity for « 2 + y 2 = l, x^ + y^— 1. 
Evidently G=AB', whence G' = A'B\ and the equation then is 
1 +AA'BB' = AA' + BB > , 
that is, 
(1 - A A') (1 - BB') = 0. 
But BB' = 1 gives the illusory result 
+ iyi = B, 
therefore 
and the required solution thus is 
1 -AA'= 0; 
, . A (x + iy) + B 
Xl + njl ~l+AB'(x + iyy 
where A is a unit-vector (say A = cos A, + i sin \) and B, B! are conjugate vectors. Or, 
writing B = b + i/3, B' = b — i/3, the constants are \, b, /3; three constants as it should be. 
Dear 
of' the qu: 
than you 
it to be 
Higher P 
deg-order 
reduce it 
with an e: 
form, deg- 
But 
has no ex 
then the 
where the 
Say t] 
the coeffic: 
d x U, «fee., 
as it shoi 
whether, p± a 
Cambric
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.