Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 13)

943] 
ON RECIPROCANTS AND DIFFERENTIAL INVARIANTS. 
403 
we see at once that in the first equation the terms contain each of them the factor 
a m’+m-i } an q i n the second equation they contain each of them the factor 
omitting these factors, we find 
7 (ya + n'v) — — (ya' 4- nv') 
m' + m — 1 ’ 
m 
— (ya + nv + v) (m - 1) + (/jl! + v) (/x + n'v + v) 
UV> + V '^ + (p + nv ' + v> ) = pi + v i- 
The first of these gives 
/¿i = (m + m — 1) , (ya + nv) - ~ (/a' + nv )}-, 
[m m ) 
which is the value of ya 2 : substituting this in the second equation, we have 
/ 
v x — —, (/a + nv 4- v) (m — 1) — — (a + nv' + v) 
m m 7 
+ (/a' + v) (ya + n'v + v) — (ya + v) (/x + nv + v) 
— (m'-f- m — 1)4 n'v) — (m' + ni — 1) — (uf + nv). 
m 7 v m 
In the left-hand column, the terms containing (ya -1- n'v) are 
iV , _/ P 
= (ya + wV) z/, 
and there are besides the terms —,v(m — 1) + v (/a'4 v), hence the left-hand column is 
O + n'v) j —, (m — l) + fi' + v'— (m' + m - !)[■, 
= vz/ (?z' + 1) 4- /xv + fi'v ( m — 1 + 1) . 
We have therefore 
= z^z/ (n' + 1) + yav + /xv + l) — vv' (n + 1) — ¡xv + 1^ — /x'v, 
that is, 
Vj = vv in' — n) + —7 (m — 1) v — — (mf — l)v'. 
m m x 7 
To complete the proof, it would be of course necessary to compare the remaining 
terms on the two sides respectively: but in what precedes it is shown that, the form 
being assumed, the expression for the alternant must of necessity be (ya, v, m' + m — 1, n'4n). 
where ya, v have their foregoing values. 
51—2
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.