Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 13)

950] ON THE SEXTIC RESOLVENT EQUATIONS OF JACOBI AND KRONECKER. 479 
where the terms containing 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 34 respectively are each =0, viz. the 
coefficient of 12 is (- e + e 4 ) + (- e 4 + 1) + (- 1 + e) = 0 : that of 13 is 
1 — e 3 -f (e 2 — 1) + (— e 2 + e 3 ) = 0 : 
and so for the other coefficients. In like manner it appears that the terms multiplied 
by 1, 2, 3, 4 (= os 1 , x 2 , x 3 , # 4 ) respectively are each =0, and thus the equation in 
question is verified. And in like manner it is shown that 
fo + e [fi + /2 + e 4 / 3 + ~ 0. 
The roots / thus satisfy the relations 
fo + fi+ f 2 + fs+ / 4 =-/Vo, 
fo + e2 /l + ^ fl + e f3 + e? ’fi = 0, 
/0 + e 3 fi + efa + e 4 / 3 + e 2 / 4 = 0, 
or the equation for / 2 belongs to the class of Jacobi’s multiplier equations. Hence 
(see Brioschi’s “Appendice terza” before referred to) the form of the equation is 
(/ 2 — a) 6 - 4a (/ 2 — a) 5 + 106 (/ 2 - of — 4c (/ 2 — a) 4- ob 2 - 4>ac = 0, 
or determining the arbitrary coefficient v so that a may be =0, the form is 
/ 12 + 106/ 6 - 4c/ 2 + ob 2 = 0, 
which is Kronecker’s equation 
/ 12 - 10 <£/ 6 + 51/r 2 = yjrf\ 
As to the meaning of the coefficients a, b, c, I recall that, in virtue of the foregoing 
linear relations between the roots, these may be expressed in terms of three arbitrary 
quantities a 0 , a lt a 2 as follows: 
f =a 0 V5, 
/0 = + ®1 + 
fi = a 0 + ea x + e 4 a 2 , 
/2 = a 0 + e 2 a x + e 3 a 2 , 
/3 = a 0 + e 3 aj + e 2 a 2 , 
/4 = a 0 + e 4 a x + ea 2 , 
and a, b, c are then determinate functions of a 0 , a 1} a 2 , viz. we have 
a= a 2 + a x a 2 , 
b = 8a 0 4 aia 2 — 2 a 0 2 a 1 2 a 2 2 + a^aj — a 0 (af 3 + a 2 5 ), 
c = 80a 0 6 a 1 2 a 3 2 — 4Oa 0 4 a 1 3 a 2 3 + 5a 0 2 a 1 4 a 2 4 + a^a/' 
— a 0 (32a 0 4 — 20a 0 2 a 1 a 2 + ba 2 a 2 ) (a? + a/) 
+ l (a a 5 + a 2 5 ) 2 ; 
so that, for a = 0 and therefore a 0 = V— a^, we have 
6 = lla! 3 a 2 3 — a 0 (a 2 5 + a 2 5 ), 
c = — 44a 1 6 a 2 5 — 57a Q a^a 2 (a^ + a 2 5 ) + | (af + a 2 5 ) 2 , 
but I do not know that for Kronecker’s form the actual values of a 0 , a 1} a 2 in terms 
of the coefficients of the quintic equation have been calculated.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.