CHAPTER XVI
SPINNING ELECTRONS
Without any assertion of finality in the description of electronic
interactions by its means, the importance of the spinning model of
the electron can scarcely be overestimated. Yet the spinning elec
tron has been so lost in the far wider ideas embodied in the new
mechanics that it is as yet scarcely appreciated at its full value. . . .
The spinning electron has brought order out of chaos in the
broad outlines of atomic theory. Its necessity and its successes are
qualitatively independent of the new mechanics.
R. H. Fowler, Nature, January 15, 1927
1. Early Work on Spinning Electrons
HE conception of a rotating electron has been suggested by
1 many investigators. Reference may be made to the work
of Voigt (1902), and of Abraham (1903), and it is of interest to
notice that Ritz in his magnetic model of 1908, in which he
attempted an interpretation of spectral series, definitely put
forward the idea that his elementary magnets might be composed
of electrically charged bodies rotating about an axis. McLaren
in 1913 described a magneton which was endowed with an
angular momentum of amount h/271. It is true that in one sense
this magneton cannot be described as a spinning electron, for
McLaren rejected entirely the idea of electric or of magnetic
substance, and supposed that the angular momentum of the
magneton was to be found in the electro-magnetic field. The
essential fact remains that McLaren first postulated a physical
unit endowed with the quantum of angular momentum.
In a discussion on the structure of the atom at the Royal
Society on March 19, 1914, in referring to the magnetic moment
of the magneton, the author * made a tentative suggestion that
the core of an atom might be regarded as a revolving sphere of
positive electricity, or, alternatively, that the electron might be
a revolving sphere of negative electricity.
Another type of spinning electron is the magneton or “ anchor
ring ” electron of A. L. Parson (1915) in which a ring of negative
* H. S. Allen, Nature, vol. 92, p. 713, 1914 ; Phil. Mag., vol. 29,
p. 714, 1915.