402
to argue against that idea ; and now it seems to me that
I can find no better illustration of the direct and definite
action of transforming influence, pure and simple.
One striking case of the adaptation of the colour of
animals to their surroundings is to be found in the fact
that insects resting on the green leaves of the spring and
summer change with the changing leaves of autumn.
“ When the first larvae on the elm are seen,
The crawling insects, like the leaves, are green ;
Ere chill October shakes the latest down,
They, like the foliage, change their tints to brown.”
—(O. W. Holmes.)
Now, I presume that if this were due to Natural Selection,
the process of change would be somewhat in this wise.
Some individuals would be born with a certain tendency
slightly to change from green to brown, as the summer
was passing away ; that these would be less conspicuous
than those which remained green, and that in conse
quence of this they would survive, while their unchanged
comrades would be destroyed. But there is another
explanation which can be established by observation and
experiment, which dispenses with the need, and excludes
the possibility, of Natural Selection.
“ Green chlorophyll remains unchanged in the tissues of leaf-eating
insects, and, being discernible through the transparent integument,
produces the same colour as that of the food plant.”—(Wallace.
Tropical Nature, p. 170.)
“ The green colour of the blood of most larvae is adventitious in
origin, having been derived from the chlorophyll of the leaves ; it is,
however, much modified in constitution by the time it reaches the
blood. The green colouring matter passes from the blood into the
cells of the surface of the body in many caterpillars, but is re
dissolved in the blood of the chrysalis. It is then made use of,
in certain species, to tinge the eggs ; and after this, is absorbed
into the body of the young larvae, which afterwards hatch from them,
protecting them with a green colour, before they have had time to