422
It may be noted that there are some useful variations,
which are produced by transforming influences in such a
way as to exclude the action of Natural Selection.
If variations which are not useful have arisen from
other causes than the action of Natural Selection, and
change of conditions has rendered them of possible utility,
it does not follow that Natural Selection will come into
play. They may have arisen first, apart from utility, and
they may then have been utilised by the intelligence ol
animals. Browning, in his Pippa Passes, states a case
which may be taken as illustrative of this principle:—
“ Have you not seen me range our coppice yonder
In search of a distorted ash ?■—I find
The wry spoilt branch a natural perfect bow.”
But it is only those useful variations, the utility of which
has led to their selection at every stage of development,
which have been produced by Natural Selection.
Mr. Darwin says that, “ when a variation is of the
slightest use to any being,” we cannot tell how much is
due to transforming and how much to selecting influences.
But we must remember that Natural Selection acts by
life and death. A useful variation, to be useful from the
point of view of Natural Selection, must make a difference
of life and death, and we can hardly believe that “ a varia
tion of the slightest use ” can have been produced by
Natural Selection. The illustration which he gives as to
his doubt on this matter does not seem to be particularly
well chosen. He does not know whether the better fur
is produced by transforming or selecting influences, and
he adds that climate has some direct influence on the
hair of our domestic quadrupeds. But the facts of the
case are hardly such as to justify this statement.
No better illustration of organic sensitiveness to exter
nal conditions could be found than the following account,