550
in the production of the varied forms of life, there is no direct palaeon
tological evidence which would certainly establish any particular
theory as to the precise modus operandi. With regard more particu
larly to the theory of the origin of species by means of Natural
Selection, the evidence of palaeontology cannot be said to be con
clusive.”—(Nicholson and Lydekker. A Manual of Palaeontology,
jrd ed., vol. p. 104.)
It is only right to observe that this declaration is made
mainly on the ground of the absence of closely graduated
transitional forms between allied morphological forms.
This phenomenon is—
“in part explained by the known imperfection of the geological
record, but this does not appear to offer an adequate solution of the
difficulty. The theory of the origin of species by means of Natural
Selection, as elaborated by the master-mind of Darwin, constitutes
nevertheless an invaluable, indeed an indispensable, guide in all
branches of palaeontological research.”—(p. ioj.)
What is really valuable in this statement is that we have
no direct palaeontological evidence of the particular modus
operandi by which the process of Organic Evolution has
been brought about. I should be sorry to adopt the
argument against Natural Selection drawn from the im
perfection of the geological record, seeing how fatal such
objection would be to the belief in Organic Evolution,
no less than in Natural Selection ; and remembering how
many missing links have already been found. And surely
it is a remarkable assertion that Natural Selection, whose
direct action cannot be perceived in palaeontology, should
be regarded as an indispensable guide in palaeontological
research. It is not a belief in Natural Selection, but in
Organic Evolution, which affords the necessary guidance.
If palaeontology affords, as most writers assume, a very
strong, if not the strongest, argument in favour of Organic
Evolution, and yet does not give any proof as to the par
ticular law or conditions under which the evolution has
taken place, it only remains for us to interpret the past by