'I,
ÄSÄ»
Hi
H9B
It will be noticed that even for a perfectly corrected lens
the MTF starts falling from zero frequency upwards, hence
perfect imagery of the object spectrum is never possible.
This contrasts with electronic transfer systems, which
commonly have a flat transfer function over their entire
working range.
Numerous techniques have been developed for measuring
MTF’s, but discussion of them is outside the scope of this
Figure 3. Representative Lens and Emulsion
Transfer Functions
article. It should be mentioned, however, that actual
sinusoidal targets are not always used ; other methods
include the harmonic analysis of the image of a very narrow
line, and calculation from the shape of the wavefront of the
light emerging from a lens. When applied to a given lens
these apparently very different methods give concordant
results, strengthening belief in the reality of the transfer
function and the value of the Fourier approach. Flowever,
it must be appreciated that the instrumental problems are
much more severe than in the measurement of resolving-
power, very precise specification of all relevant physical
factors is essential, and the familiar problems of working
off-axis and averaging across the field are even more difficult
to solve. The precise transfer function obtained for a given
lens at a given point in its field naturally depends upon the
colour and spectral bandwidth of the light used and on the
focal plane selected.
Application of the Transfer Function
Transforming the image as we see it into its spatial fre
quency spectrum, and measuring transfer functions, are fairly
elaborate procedures requiring experimental and computing
facilities not universally available ; we may well inquire what
is gained by such an artificial approach. The complication is
partially justified by the theoretical insight it affords. Fourier
analysis is a tool of general scientific importance which has
contributed to progress in many fields, e.g., physical optics,
electrical engineering, and tidal research. By extending it to
photography, or by studying the possibilities of doing so,
what is apparently an extreme artificiality might be justified
by using a terminology common to science in general, possibly
leading to greater understanding by suggestive analogies. To
a certain extent this has proved true. A more practical
advantage lies in the ability to combine any number of
transfer functions by simple multiplication. In aerial
photography the image may become blurred or degraded at
numerous stages, e.g., in the optical imagery, by image move
ment and so on. At each of these stages an ideal point object
gives rise to a more or less blurred image, the “ spread
function.” To estimate the overall performance we must
combine these individual blurs, which can only be done with
full accuracy by the difficult mathematical process of convolu
tion. Moreover, in certain important cases the spread
function cannot be measured directly but is derived by
Fourier transformation from the transfer function. Some
stages, such as the aircraft window or atmospheric turbulence,
cannot be assigned a general transfer function, but for any
particular conditions an effective transfer function can be
calculated. Then by multiplying all the functions together,
ordinate by ordinate, the overall transfer function of the
system is obtained. An example is given in Figure 4. The
o’,
005
A - PAN X EMULSION
B - f/5*0 6" LENS
C - 25 MICRONS MOVEMENT
D - A * B * C
5 o
M.M.
SPATIAL FREdUENCY CYCLES PER
Figure 4. Cascading of Transfer Functions
transfer functions for a typical 6-inch photogrammetric lens,
for Panatomic X Aerographic emulsion, and for 25 microns
of uniform image movement, are shown separately and
combined. The diagram gives information about the system
as a whole and the contribution of each component, clearly
displayed for all points in the frequency passband. By using
logarithmic scales the multiplication is simplified, slide-rule
methods can be used, and the procedure becomes very useful
to the designer, who can see where weaknesses lie, rapidly
change parameters, and converge his system towards the
optimum balance. This is apparently a great advance on
resolving-power, which gives information about just one
point on the frequency scale and can only be combined with
other resolving-power figures by arbitrary reciprocal formulae.
However, it is not enough to obtain an overall transfer
function for the system. By itself this tells us nothing about
the image quality we can obtain, since it is merely a statement
of relative modulation transfer. We cannot even rank
systems by their transfer functions alone ; to say that one is
better than another we must specify the purpose for which it
is better, and this requires a knowledge of the input spectrum
on which it is to operate. It cannot be said too often that
by electing to u
“ frequency doi
to images as th
the term “ spa
photographers i
ing-power, it ha
no clear differe
functions can
conclusions dri
Failure to appi
Aerial scenes
ing spectra exte
nor necessary
first sight we n
typical aerial i
representing ty
spectrum acco
occurrence. T
profitable app
spectrum woul
for example, th
band could ch
and back agaii
a wide spectrur
arbitrary. Th
terms, and wh;
aerial scenes, ^
approach woi
objects which
shape of lines,
to make no we
is a subject on
It would not
beyond pointi
continuously-f
and that smal
the bandwidth
have illustrate
mental adjusti
frequency dor
Assuming tl
is to be reprc
comparing di:
corresponds t
information tl
often done by
which may se
result which c
time. Howe^
benefit of usii
his system, tc
a commonly i
of some bette
To predict
have to make
its granularib
The target m
recorded as a
by the produ<
local slope of
a “ signal.”
tion observed
of emulsion is
in diameter,
spatial frequi
effectively re<