52 
Radial Distortion Effects 
of Compensating Glass Plates 
in Projection Prirjter Wild U3A 
h = 0 m 
Compensation = 0 
Diapositiv.e nr1 x 
nr 2 o 
The curve measured at the Division of PhotogrammetryOhegnd method) 
— attheGeographical Survey Office 
dr' pm 
10 ■ 
10 
=*-s- 
* 
I--» 
150 r’mm 
Standard errors of unit weight (the grid method) 
X S.'s 22 1.9 16 26 21 2.1 11 30 3.4 3 5 38 33 4.4 4.7 4.2 6.0 microns 
o S.'=22 19 16 19 2.1 29 35 4.4 3.8 4.2 4.0 5! 4.5 45 4.3 4.1 
Fig. 2.4:4 
Radial Distortion Effects 
of Compensating Glass Plates 
in Projection Printer Wild U3A 
h = 1500 m 
Diapositive nr 3 x 
"— nr 4 o 
The curve measured at the Division of Photogrammetrydhe grid method) 
— “ " at the Geographical Survey Office 
The nominal curve of the —"— 
The radial distortion effects of photographs according to 
operative tests (average of 5 cameras theOland test field) 
O S.'s 08 16 27 20 1.1 2.6 20 26 30 28 28 3437 51 4.0 4,7 — 
Fig. 2.4:5 
Radial Distortion Effects 
of Compensating Glass Plates 
in Projection Printer Wild U3A 
h = 3000 m 
Diapositive nr 5 * 
nr 6 ° 
The curve measured at the Division of Fhotogrammetry (the grid mctbod) 
" " at the Geographical Survey Office 
The nominal curve of the —*— — 
The radial distortion effects of photographs according to 
operative tests (average of 5 cameras, the Oland test field) 
dr'pm 
Standard errors of unit weight (the grid method) 
X S.'s 16 22 2.1 23 1.8 19 33 28 28 3.5 33 36 36 5.1 51 5.9 microns 
o S.’s 10 1.1 19 19 23 28 31 3.0 22 2.6 3.2 29 38 3.6 32 5.6 — 
Fig. 2.4:6