ANALYTICAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC INSTRUMENTS
A
6
praxis and research in high precision nu
merical photogrammetry.
The field of mono-comparators has done
somewhat better, in that several commercial
enterprises have addressed themselves to the
problem of designing a semi-automatic com
parator which is particularly adapted to the
measurement of imagery that is ‘hard’ and
predictable in form and pattern, like star or
satellite trail photography. While the image
sensing techniques are promising, it remains
to be seen if the measuring accuracy will live
up to the advertised expectations.
Papers presented for consideration in the
field of comparators were:
1. author:
title :
2. author:
title:
3. author:
title :
4. author:
title:
5. author:
title:
6. author:
title:
Hans G. Beck and Günter Fehlkamm,
VEB Carl Zeiss, Jena, German Demo
cratic Republic.
Ein Koordinatenmessgerät mit Ko
ordinatenregistrierung “Komess 2”
(A Coordinate Measurement Instru
ment with Coordinate-Measurement
Device—Komess 2).
J. C. Millard, OPTICAL and Me
chanical Society, France.
Experiences with Stereocomparator
S. O. M.
Klaus Szangolies, VEB Carl Zeiss,
Jena, German Democratic Republic.
Photogrammetrische Registriergeräte
(Photogrammetric Recording Equip
ment)
O. Weibrecht, VEB Carl Zeiss, Jena,
German Democratic Republic.
Das Stecometer mit automatisches
Registriereinrichtung (The Stecom
eter with Automatic Recording De
vice).
T. J. Blachut, National Research
Council, Ottawa, Canada, Division of
Applied Physics.
Mono-measurements in photogram
metric operations.
M. Carboneil, IGN, Paris, France.
Advantages Compares, pour l’Aero-
triangulation, du Stereocomparator
S. O. M. et du Stereotopographe
Poivilliers S. O. M. Type BP équipé
d’un ENREGISREUR de Coordon
nées. (Compared Advantages of the
Stereocomparator S. O. M. and
the Stereotopograph Poivilliers BP,
Equipped with a Coordinate Recorder
for Aerotriangulation Work).
kamm deals with a modification of the
Komess jf2-instrument and is concerned with
the incorporation of semi-automatic registra
tion equipment for the coordinate measure
ments. An effort was made to provide an
economically feasible solution which can be
attained by a limited amount of modification
to already existing instruments.
The comparator works in agreement with
Abbe’s principle and follows, during the
registration, a least count of 0.1 micron. The
overall accuracy of the Komess is given as
±0.5/1. The semi-automatic registration,
when compared with a fully automatic read
out procedure, will increase the duration of
operation by only 10%. In many respects,
this instrument fulfills requirements which
have been discussed earlier. The realization
of Abbe’s principle, combined with a O.ln
readout interval and an overall accuracy of
+ 0.5ju, are features which will in the future
become more and more significant for preci
sion photogrammetry.
The Komess #2, therefore, appears to be an
instrument which has potential for all preci
sion photogrammetric projects where the
mono-plate principle can be applied, espe
cially for astronomical work and, correspond
ingly, also for the application of satellite
photogrammetry for geodetic purposes.
The introductory sentence, which states
that numerical photogrammetric evaluation
methods can only be executed economically
with the use of mono-comparators, is, how
ever, open to question. As stated at the end of
the subject paper, the measuring accuracy
will ultimately depend on the pointing accu
racy. In topographic photogrammetry, the
stereo viewing and, correspondingly, the
simultaneous measuring of two or more plates
cannot as yet be replaced by independently
executed point marking or pricking pro
cedures, if measurements in the micron region
are contemplated. This subject will come up
later in connection with Dr. Weibrecht’s
paper.
Three papers deal with comparator-type
coordinate instruments and/or associated
registration equipment, while three papers
address themselves to principal considera
tions of mono versus stereo measurements
and/or give results obtained from the nu
merical treatment of coordinate measure
ments.
In particular, the paper by Beck and Fehl-
The paper by I. C. Millard first discusses
some tests which were executed to determine
the overall accuracy of the S.O.M. compara
tor. The comparator is reported as having a
standard deviation of ± 2 microns, computed
from 200 measurements. The main body of
the paper deals with a series of modifications
which were designed to reduce recording
errors of the Ferranti-counters. The changes