VISUAL FATIGUE, calling for nightly rest, and its
counterpart: the necessity for daily stimulation, are
both properties which seem at first sight not to fit
in the group. There is & lot of physiology involved,
but emotion may upset the expected decrease in
performance due to visual fatigue, and attention is
a second psychological factor which strongly |
counteracts it. What makes viewing tiresome are such |
factors as: incorrect instrumental adjustment, residual
y-parallax in stereo-viewing, non-optimum line of sight, an unusual
illumination (fluorescent, strange colours), unusual poor image quality,
disturbing patterns, noise, etc. Many of these factors are known and can
b e be accounted for - ergonomy enters our profession albeit slowly. See
Nathan 1961, and further journals as "Vision Research" and "Ergonomics".
A photogrammetric ergonomic study was published in Japanese by Usami
(Usami 1961).
[Visual fatigue caused by monotony is more dangerous than tiredness
after prolonged execution of an interesting task. The latter can be
reduced by training, the first can hardly be overcome. But, where
Ww
monotony has to be avoided, it is nevertheless wise to keep vision
in good condition by daily training: human beings need to see
everyday in order not to loose even the ability to see straight
lines straight and to recognize simple shapes - five days of arti-
ficial blindness is enough to disturb vision temporarily (Vernon
1962, p. 189).]
The CAPACITY of the neural network and the FLOW of
INFORMATION are terms which lead us to a communi-
cation theory. From this point of view it is not
strange to ask questions on the "hows" and "what's"
of the visual information flow, the input to the
brain.
To state it frankly: human capacity of information
flow is rather limited. Both eyes cannot see two
different pictures at the same moment; if such an
experiment is set up - the eyes tend to alternate,
and each sends the information during the inactive phase of the other.
Listening and seeing does not go together either, there should be at
least 1/5 of a sec. time interval between the stimuli for the eyes and
ears, or the signals should contain sufficient redundancy.