form of the original negative and the diapositive were compared approximately
half a year after the corresponding comparison of line 5 was performed. The | |
deformation of the negative is clearly indicated by the increase of the accu- |
racy factor which is now +41 microns and with maximum value of 70. This value
also matches with the results of the comparison that is given on row 4 in which
the same negative is compared to the camera fiducial marks. The small differ-
ence is due to the deformation that has taken place in the diapositive, which
established further proof of the fact that large deformations have not taken
place in the diapositive.
The conclusion can be presented that if the participant of the experiment has
received diapositives that were copied from the original negative directly C SS
after preparation, the results should be more or less normal. However, if the
diapositives have been prepared later the continuous affine deformation taking
place in the negative must be taken into account. It can be generally said of
the deformations that no large deformations have taken place in the diapositi-
ves but that continuous affine deformation has taken and is taking place in
the original negative. It is unnecessary to further analyse the reasons for
this without better knowledge of the circumstances.