ra a i
B) the marked roof corners, classilied in 4 ca-
tegories according to the compass bearings of the
mark, and hence as a rule according to the intensity
of the contrast with the close surroundings of the
roof —
southern corners: m,,(s, n), —
m, :
= u (240.4 on (6
ik 1000? lani: 6
western corners: m,, (s, n)» —
m,
= + | 9 S zs | 7
E (14 + 0 1000? [um] (7)
eastern corners: m,,(s, n)s^
m.
= + (18 —0.34——) m 8)
EK 1000 Lem]
northern corners: my, (s, n)
—_
4 m
I 18 —0.2 —= 9
© em E (19 1000 ) [um] (9)
on the average: my,(s , n)1.4
ms
t 9 —0.2 —
d 1000
) [uml (10)
The values calculated from Eas. (5) and (10) are
so close to each other that (5) can be substituted
for (10).
C) For the unmarked roof corners, classified
in four categories according to the compass bearings
of the roof corners and hence according to the in-
tensity of the contrast with the closest surrounding
of the roof —
W
50um
40
30
Puy
20
10
<r ^ + t "
southern roof corners: m,,(0, n), —
= + 3000 ——
(m;
western roof corners: m,, (0, n)? —
1
ym,
uml. (11)
= + 2600
[um] (12)
eastern rool corners: my,(o, n) —
1
= = 2300 [um] (13)
V ms
northern rooï corners: m,, (0, n) —
DI.
= + 7000 V [um] (14)
V Ins
on the average therefore: m,,(o, n) —
1
1
= 3 2500 7 — [nml (15)
V ms
Separate graphs for southern, western, eastern
and northern roof corners represent the above rela-
tions for the four scales under discussion, in Fig. 5.
The equations (5) to (15), expressed graphic-
ally in Fig. 5, prove that the values of the mean
planimetric errors [in um on the image scale]:
a) can be considered virtually constant for the
marked points of the photogrammetric test field (at
the given scales);
b) are very close to the values for the marked
test-field points in the case of marked rooíi corners;
c) are higher than those for marked roof corn-
ers and diminish with the image scale in the case ol
unmarked rool corners.
| €
ib
| | |
| |
| |
Li Ll e. À
Cy Q € e -
5 € e .
Nn 9 co e
e « oN e oe © e ©
v oN - oN