een done
defining
y resec-
1izes the
checking
ras, and
efinition
finition,
lent) no
‘ining a
ition of
1 point,
oint as
al point
Such a
he phy-
concept
ut this
elonged
es with
cessary
. More-
nation,
id phy-
'incipal
ptional
sidered
central
t both
nce of
to the
of the
> same
mpres-
> point
use a
which
Cases
tiated.
at the
l of a
1 that
point
ropose
terms
23Ssary
ise to
They
d the
netry,
for its knowledge is necessary and adequate for the solution of the basic problem of
photogrammetry. It will be well to accord this fundamental relation a name of its own.
In the first place, this will simplify many formulations. What is more, however, this
designation is in line with the conception that it is not essentially necessary in photo-
grammetry that a central projection is concerned, but that any kind of a relation may
exist between the image points and the principal rays. Actually, indeed, the camera
function considerably deviates from the tangent function in lenses with marked distor-
tion (such as the Pleon), so that in this case the new concept name is almost compelling.
Whoever does not need it can, of course, avoid its use without attendant disadvantage.
The image function does not, as might be thought, belong among the technical con-
cepts. At the present time, anyway, regular film shrinkage is not below the limit of ac-
curate measurement, but can without difficulty be considered in the plotting process.
In the sense of photogrammetry, it therefore is not to be rated as a manufacturing error
(whereas irregular film shrinkage is a manufacturing error and does not enter into the
physical definition). For the rest, the difference between the camera function and the
image function is conditioned by all other changes in scale ratio (as, for instance, in the
reduction of the original photo for plotting).
Inner orientation of a camera or an image are terms signifying the geometrical
counterparts of the camera and image functions. They are the spatial arrangements
whereby those analytical functions materialize. By this confrontation, the descriptive
geometrical import of the term "inner orientation" is made to stand out distinctly.
It has been tried to work out as clearly as possible the analogy between the mathe-
matical definition and the two physical definitions (for the camera and the image). On
the other hand, however, it is imperative in inner orientation to allow for the fact that
different conceptions underlie the description of the image forming process in the camera
and the use of the photographic picture removed from the camera. Both views are jus-
tified and necessary, and it would not be compatible with the facts if one way of view-
ing should be suppressed to favor the other merely for the sake of uniformity. For the
camera, i.e. for the union of an image plane with a lens, the relation between the object-
side principal ray bundle passing through the center of the entrance pupil and the cor-
responding points of the image plane alone is important, as is indicated by the schematic
sketch heading the right-hand column. By contrast, the plotting of an image outside the
camera is more or less linked with the idea that first — by a mechanical or optical device,
or even only in the imagination — the image points are so displaced in their plane as
to produce a distortion-free image, and that from this image and with the aid of a cent-
ral projection, the object-side bundle of rays is derived. This conception, which is illu-
strated by the corresponding sketch, therefore establishes the relation to the mathema-
tical definition. Accordingly, the inner orientation of an image was allotted to the
columns of both the mathematical and the physical concepts.
Camera constant and image constant. The designation of the constant c, in the
equation: 7/ — c,.tan zr t 4 ?/ has undergone some changes in the various languages.
In English practice the terms “focal length”, or more accurately “calibrated focal length”
have frequently been used. More lately “calibrated principal distance” was proposed
[7, 8]. In German, the expression *Bildweite" formerly was customary, whereas in recent
years "Kammerkonstante" and correspondingly “Bildkonstante” (camera constant and
image constant) have widely come into use.
The expressions ‘focal length” and “Bildweite” for designating the photogrammetric
concept should be definitely eliminated, seeing that they have always been current in
optical parlance. There they designate the distance of the image point lying on the
optical axis from the image-side lens principal point, Bildweite being the general term,
while focal length is applied only in the case of infinite object distance. This distance
in many instances is of a similar magnitude as the constant c,, but coincides with it
neither in a conceptual nor generally in a numerical sense. The term Bildweite refers to
13