Changes in Fiim Tniekness
Because the back of the film is used as a reference
surface, changes in film thickness may cause positional
errors. Figure 13a shows a famous examples [22], with one
profile in film direction. Another eleven profiles were
determined from the contour lines and again, the positional
displacements resulting from the film thickness changes were
plotted for points of the profiles - Fig. 13b. The displace-
ments were so small that almost all are less than half the
length of the diameter of the little squares indicating the
point positions. New results on film thickness measurements
have recently been published [46] which compare favourably
with earlier results ([#1, [22]).
Film thickness measurements are usually carried out
using mechanical gauges requiring a certain minimum pressure
in their use. Certain local film protuberances of 5 to
20 um height were reported in [4]. However, they could not
be measured mechanically.
Another method, which uses a grid parallel to a fiim
surface, exposed once with perpendicular light and a second
time with light incident at 15°, as well as results were
reported in [21]. These results are worse than those
referred to earlier. Figure 14 shows an example 15 x 15 cm
large with positional errors resulting when a camera with a
foeal length of 115 mm is used. Figure 15a gives profiles
through an 8 x 8 em segment of a film which had abnormally