terrain clearance is measured by radar or by more precise laser e ^
method, the accuracy of the total APR system would not exceed the
accuracy of the height corrector. Therefore, a significant im-
provement in the accuracy of terrain elevations obtained by laser
APR, as compared with a radar APR, cannot be expected. The accur-
acy of scale determined from terrain clearances is a function of
the precision with which this clearance is measured. This accur-
acy is dependent not only upon the techniques employed in measure-
ment, i.e. radar or loser, but to a larger extent is influenced
by the quality of the reflecting surfaces, i.e. type of terrain,
and partly by installation in the aircraft. In summary, the
accuracy of the total APR system is influenced predominantly by
three factors: height corrector, technique for measurement of
terrain clearance and the type of terrain (quality of reflecting
surface). e e
A
The horizon camera is capable of determining the relative
tip and tilt of the aerial camera at the moment of exposure with
an accuracy of + 2898). It is the simplest, and least expensive
method of determining and CO with an accuracy which can be
achieved or surpassed only by very expensive and sophisticated
guidance systems employed in the space programme. Unfortunately,
the horizon camera has an obvious shortcoming: namely, it is
dependent on atmospheric conditions. Nevertheless, under reason-
able weather conditions it can provide useful data. The author
has employed successfully the horizon camera on surveys in Nigeria,
Canada and recently in Ghana.
Q. QU c FN N
Ib.
FC cc c
Im